Archimica (Florida) - Executive Summary

| Accident History | Chemicals | Emergency Response | Registration | Source | Executive Summary |

                     ARCHIMICA (FLORIDA) 
 
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 
 
Archimica (Florida), Inc. uses five regulated substances in various reactions during the 
manufacturing of organic chemicals (NAICS Code 32519).  The regulated substances are listed 
below. 
 
 Acetylene (flammable, CAS # 74-86-2) 
 Anhydrous ammonia (toxic, CAS # 7664-41-7) 
 Oleum (toxic, CAS # 8014-95-7) 
 Trichlorosilane (flammable, CAS # 10025-78-2) 
 Trimethylchlorosilane (toxic, CAS # 75-77-4) 
 
A hazard assessment was performed using the United States Environmental Protection Agency 
(USEPA) RMP*CompTM. Model.  The worst-case release scenarios were assumed to be the total 
release of the largest quantity of each substance from their respective storage vessel for a duration 
of 10 minutes.  The alternative release scenarios we selected were failure scenarios developed during  
process hazard reviews and analyses.  The alternative release scenario for each regulated substance 
is described below. 
 
 Acetylene - A regulator fail 
ure causes the two inch diameter pipe to pressurize to 100 psig.  A 
 release occurs at the relief valve at the reactor, causing an explosion. 
 Anhydrous ammonia -The flange on the remote operated valve (ROV) fails, causing a release 
 to occur. 
 Oleum - A failure in the bottom valve in reactor R-5 due to corrosion causes a release to occur. 
 Trichlorosilane - A leak develops in the recirculation line.  This scenario is based on a release 
 that occurred at the facility on August 8, 1998. 
 Trimethylchlorosilane - A two inch diameter pipe fails at the pipe rack causing a release to occur. 
 
The following accidental release scenarios were selected based on the distance to the endpoints as 
determined by RMP*Comp. 
 
 One worst-case release scenario for the toxic substances (anhydrous ammonia). 
 One worst-case release scenario flammable substances (trichlorosilane).   
 Every alternative release scenario for the toxic substances (anhydrous ammonia, oleum, 
 trimethylchlorosilane). 
 O 
ne alternative release for the flammable substances (trichlorosilane). 
 
Potential zones of impact were constructed for the selected release scenarios.  These zones were 
analyzed to provide estimates of the total population and public and environmental receptors that 
could potentially be exposed should the hypothetical releases occur.  Although off-site areas would 
be impacted by the releases, we believe that safety procedures and mitigation measures will reduce 
the potential for off-site consequences and subsequent risks to the surrounding community.  Our 
safety devices include detectors, alarms, and automatic system shut-off features.  
 
We have had three releases with offsite consequences in the last five years.  The substances and dates 
of the releases are listed below. 
 
 Trichlorosilane, June 17, 1994 
 Anhydrous Ammonia, May 8, 1998 
 Trichlorosilane, August 8, 1998 
 
Information from each release was collected and reviewed to determine the corrective actions to be 
implemented to p 
revent a reoccurrence.  We considers near-misses as serious as actual releases.  
Therefore, the same procedures used for major incidences are used for near-misses. 
 
In order to fulfill the requirements of the Risk Management Program (RMP), we have developed an 
accidental release prevention program and emergency action plan for our facility. The accidental 
release prevention program satisfies the requirements for the USEPA RMP and the Occupational 
Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) Process Safety Management (PSM) program.  The 
prevention program ensures that our facility is operated under safe conditions and that any risk of 
a release is minimized.  The program has been written to reduce the potential of a release due to 
human error or equipment failure at our facility.  In order to prevent the release due to human error, 
our prevention program ensures that operating procedures are current and reviewed annually.  
Training also plays a vital part in our program.  Employees and con 
tractors working near or on the 
facility's chemical manufacturing processes are required to be trained in the various processes and 
the hazards of the chemicals used in those processes.    
 
To prevent equipment failure that could result in a release, our program ensures that equipment 
inspections, tests, and preventive maintenance are in accordance with accepted engineering practices 
and includes manufacturer's recommendations.  Manufacturing equipment is inspected and tested 
in accordance with the planned maintenance schedule.  
 
All existing and proposed future equipment has been designed according to applicable standards and 
codes.  We maintain records and documentation on equipment inspections and tests.  Precautions 
are taken to ensure that new equipment and processes are inspected and tested, that all changes on 
the processes are authorized, and employees are informed of changes. 
 
We performed Process Hazard Analyses (PHA) to address the facility hazards and to evaluate and 
contro 
l where the potential for a release exists.  Employees were involved in determining hazards 
of the processes and subsequent consequences.   
 
Active employee participation will ensure the success of the RMP at our facility.  Employees have 
been assigned various tasks to ensure that all elements of the RMP are implemented.  We have 
developed specific programs and forms to assist employees in performing, recording, and 
documenting the various elements of the RMP.  
 
In the event of a release, we have implemented an Emergency Response Program in compliance with 
29 CFR 1910.38 and 29 CFR 1910.120.  Our facility is also included in the community emergency 
response plan.  Employees at our facility are thoroughly trained to respond to accidental releases that 
occur on-site.  The Emergency Response Program consists of initial response procedures, response 
team procedures, facility emergency numbers, and coordination with the Gainesville Fire 
Department.  The plan also addresses notification pr 
ocedures to the public and the local emergency 
response agency.    
 
We conducted a neighborhood open house under the Local Emergency Planning Committee's 
(LEPC) Safety Street program in March 1999.  We are also willing to conduct tours of our facility 
for members of the public.
Click to return to beginning