Bluebell Gas Plant - Executive Summary

| Accident History | Chemicals | Emergency Response | Registration | Source | Executive Summary |

 Issue Date:    Revision Date:     Revision         Page 1 
  06/01/99         06/03/99       Number: 2 
Coastal  Field Services Company (CFS), operator for the  Bluebell 
Gas  Processing Plant, is committed to operating in a manner that 
is safe for CFS workers, the public and the environment.  As part 
of  this commitment, CFS has established a system to help  ensure 
safe  operation of the processes at this facility.  One component 
of  this system is a Risk Management Plan (RMP) that helps manage 
the  risks at CFS and that complies with the requirements of  the 
Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) regulation 40 CFR  part 
68,  Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk  Management 
Programs (the RMP rule). 
One  of  the  requirements of the RMP rule is to  submit  a  risk 
management  plan (RMPlan) describing the risk management  program 
at  CFS.   This  document  is  intended  to  satisfy  the  RMPlan 
requirement  of  the RMP rule and to provide the  public  with  a 
description of the risk management program at CFS. 
The RMP program at CFS consists of three (3) elements: 
1)   A hazard assessment to help understand: 
              The potential offsite consequences of hypothetical 
              accidental releases and; 
         l    accidents that have occurred during the last five (5) years 
              associated with the use of substances regulated by the RMP rule 
              (regulated substances). 
2)   A prevention program to help maintain and safely operate the 
    processes  containing more than a threshold  quantity  of  a 
    regulated substance (covered processes). 
3)   An  emergency response program to help respond to accidental 
    releases of regulated substances from covered processes. 
Information further describing these elements is provided in this 
Although the RMP program at CFS helps provide assurance that  the 
facility is maintained  
and operated in a safe manner, it is  only 
one  component  of the safety program at CFS.  In  fact,  CFS  is 
presently  developing a comprehensive safety program to safeguard 
against  the  release of hazardous substances and limit  injuries 
and damage to its employees, the public and the environment. 
 Issue Date:    Revision Date:     Revision         Page 2 
  06/01/99         06/03/99       Number: 2 
CFS  limits  the  use of hazardous substances.   Before  using  a 
hazardous  substance, less hazardous alternatives are considered. 
When a hazardous substance is used at CFS, consideration is given 
to  the  potential  for  this substance to adversely  affect  CFS 
workers,  the public, and the environment and CFS takes steps  to 
prevent any such effects. 
CFS  prevents releases of the hazardous substances  used  at  the 
facility.   When  a  hazardous substance  is  used  at  CFS,  the 
equipment is carefully designed, built and operated 
to reduce the 
likelihood  of  an accidental release.  Industry  and  government 
standards are closely adhered to in the design, construction, and 
operation of the equipment. 
CFS  limits damage from a release, if such a release occurs.  CFS 
trains workers to respond to an emergency response, reducing  the 
consequences of a release if it occurs.  In addition,  CFS  works 
with  the  local  fire  department and with the  local  emergency 
planning  committee  (LEPC) to limit injuries  and  environmental 
damage if a release does occur. 
The  safety program at CFS consists of a number of elements, many 
of  which  are  required by the RMP rule.   These  are  the  same 
elements  defined under the OSHA Process Safety Management  (PSM) 
Rule,  which  are  required for this facility.   This  RMPlan  is 
primarily intended to describe those parts of the safety  program 
at CFS that are required by the RMP rule. 
New Ownership 
In   March  1999,  CFS  acquired  the  Bluebell  Gas  Plant   and 
ding  pipeline gathering system from Gary Williams  Energy 
Corporation.   Since this ownership change,  CFS  has  begun  the 
process of assimilating and reviewing all available Gary Williams 
Energy  plans, procedures, permits, and other pertinent operating 
data  to  ensure it meets CFS's commitment level  of  safe  plant 
The  implementation of the RMPlan relies significantly  on  these 
documents, of which several will be rewritten or developed in the 
future.   CFS views the RMPlan as a dynamic document, which  will 
change over time as we proceed to create and implement our safety 
and operational documents. 
 Issue Date:    Revision Date:     Revision         Page 3 
  06/01/99         06/03/99       Number: 2 
Accidental Release Prevention and Emergency Response Policies 
CFS  is committed to the safety of workers and the public and the 
preservation  of  the  environment,  through  the  prevention   
accidental  releases  of  hazardous  substances.  CFS  implements 
reasonable controls to prevent foreseeable releases of  hazardous 
substances.    These  controls  include  training  programs   for 
personnel;  programs  to  help  ensure  safety  in  the   design, 
installation, operation, and maintenance of processes at CFS; and 
programs  to  evaluate the hazards at the Plant.   CFS  plans  to 
review  the  Plant's existing safety procedures and programs  and 
make modifications and improvements were appropriate. 
In  the event of an accidental release, CFS controls and contains 
the  release in a manner that will be safe for workers  and  will 
help  prevent  injury  to  the public or  the  environment.   CFS 
coordinates  response efforts with the local  emergency  response 
personnel.  Response activities have also been discussed with the 
Regulated Substances and CFS 
The  Bluebell Gas Processing Plant is a plant primarily  involved 
in  the  recovery of liquid hydrocarbons from a 
gas  stream.   As 
part  of  this process, CFS handles several regulated,  flammable 
substances  in  sufficient quantities to be covered  by  the  RMP 
rule.  There are no such quantities of regulated toxic substances 
handled at the Plant.  The following RMP-regulated flammables are 
found at the Plant: 
         Ethane              Pentane             Propane 
         Condensate               Butane 
Offsite Consequence Analysis 
CFS  performed  an offsite consequence analysis to  estimate  the 
potential  for  an  accidental release of a  regulated  substance 
which  could  affect the public or the environment.  The  offsite 
consequence  analysis  consists  of  evaluating  both  worst-case 
release  scenarios and alternative release scenarios.   CFS  does 
not  expect a worst-case to ever occur.  The alternative  release 
scenarios  were  selected  to help the local  emergency  planning 
committee  improve  the community emergency  response  plan.   An 
alternative release scenario represen 
ts a release that: 1)  might 
occur  at  a  facility such as CFS, and, 2) would result  in  the 
greatest potential offsite consequences if the release occurred. 
 Issue Date:    Revision Date:     Revision         Page 4 
  06/01/99         06/03/99       Number: 2 
The main objective of performing the offsite consequence analysis 
is to determine the distance at which certain effects might occur 
to  the  public  because  of an accidental  release  (called  the 
endpoint  distance).  Minimal effects could occur at the endpoint 
distance.   At  distances  less than the endpoint  distance,  the 
effects  would be greater; at distances greater than the endpoint 
distance, the effect would be less. 
The  RMP  rule includes specific requirements for the  worst-case 
and  alternative  release scenarios that  must  be  reported  for 
Program  3  processes.  The Bluebell Gas Plant handles quantities 
of  flammable substances that qualify the facility  
as Program  3. 
A   worst-case  and  a  alternative  release  scenario  has  been 
performed to comply with Program 3 requirements. 
The  following  information summarizes  the  offsite  consequence 
analysis performed by CFS. 
Program 3 Processes 
    Flammable Substances: 
The  worst-case  release  scenario for  flammable  substances  is 
failure  of  the 30,000-gallon butane/gasoline mix storage  tank, 
resulting in a vapor cloud explosion.  No administrative controls 
or  passive mitigation were considered for this release scenario. 
The  maximum distance to the 1-psi overpressure endpoint is  0.43 
miles.   There are offsite public receptors located  within  this 
The  alternative release scenario for flammable substances  is  a 
rupture  of  a  truck transport hose between the  truck  and  the 
butane/gasoline mix loading pumps. 
This  scenario assumes that the flammable substance (propane)  is 
released from a ruptured truck loading hose for 30 minutes before 
workers detect the r 
elease and isolate the ruptured section.  The 
substances  form  a  vapor  cloud, resulting  in  a  vapor  cloud 
explosion.  The maximum distance to the overpressure endpoint  is 
0.28  miles.  There are no offsite receptors located within  this 
CFS  does  not  expect  the  worst-case  or  alternative  release 
scenario  to ever occur.  The scenarios were selected  to  assist 
the   local  emergency  planning  committee  in  improving  their 
community emergency response plan. 
 Issue Date:    Revision Date:     Revision         Page 5 
  06/01/99         06/03/99       Number: 2 
Accidental Release Prevention Program 
CFS  plans  to  incorporate a prevention program to help  prevent 
accidental  releases of hazardous substances at the  Plant.   CFS 
formalizes  this  prevention program for all  of  our  OSHA  PSM- 
regulated natural gas processing facilities to comply with the 14 
elements  of  the  PSM prevention program.  A forma 
lized  program 
will be instituted at our recently acquired Bluebell Plant.   The 
EPA  RMP  rule  established  two  levels  of  prevention  program 
requirements.   The  level  relevant to  the  Bluebell  Plant  is 
Program  3;  essentially the same as OSHA PSM,  except  that  the 
program   also   focuses  on  protecting  the  public   and   the 
The  following  sections briefly describe the elements  of  CFS's 
prevention  program  that  address the EPA  RMP  rule  prevention 
program requirements. 
Program 3 Prevention Program 
The CFS Program 3 prevention program consists of the following 12 
         Process Safety Information 
         Process Hazard Analyses 
         Operating Procedures 
    l    Training 
    l    Employee Participation 
         Pre-Startup Safety Review 
         Mechanical Integrity 
         Hot Work Permits (Safe Work Practices) 
         Management of Change 
         Incident Investigation 
ce Audits 
All  elements  are  presently being reviewed  by  CFS  since  the 
acquisition  of  the  Plant  from  Gary  Williams  Energy.   Many 
modifications and changes are likely to occur as we evaluate each 
element against CFS practices and standards.  Changed and altered 
elements will be incorporated in the PSM manual and reflected  in 
the RMPlan during the 3-year audit cycle. 
 Issue Date:    Revision Date:     Revision         Page 6 
  06/01/99         06/03/99       Number: 2 
Process Safety Information 
CFS acquired a variety of technical documents after the ownership 
change.   Current Process Safety elements are being  assessed  to 
ensure existing process information is complete.  These documents 
1)   Physical properties of hazardous substances handled, 
2)   Operating parameters of the equipment, and 
3)   Design basis and configuration of the equipment. 
CFS ensures that this proces 
s safety information is available  to 
all CFS employees, the LEPC and the fire department. 
Material  safety  data  sheets  (MSDS's)  document  the  physical 
properties  of  hazardous substances handled  at  CFS,  including 
regulated   substances  in  covered  processes.  The  information 
available for each hazardous substance typically includes: 
1)   Toxicity information and permissible exposure limits, 
2)   Physical  data  (e.g., boiling point, melting  point,  flash 
3)   Reactivity and corrosivity data, 
4)   Thermal and chemical stability data, and 
5)   Hazards of mixing substances in the process. 
MSDS's  for  hazardous substances handled  in  each  process  are 
available  in the Plant's MSDS book so the personnel  have  ready 
reference to this information.  In addition, MSDS's are  provided 
to  the LEPC and the fire department for use in helping formulate 
emergency response plans. 
Engineering design documents include operating parameters and the 
design  basis  and   
configuration of equipment  in  each  covered 
process.  The available information will include: 
1)   Operating parameters 
2)   Block flow or simplified process flow diagrams 
3)   Process chemistry 
4)   Maximum intended inventories 
5)   Safe   upper  and  lower  limits  for  parameters  such   as 
    temperature, pressure or flow 
6)   Consequences of deviations from established operating limits 
7)   Design basis and configuration of equipment 
8)   Piping  and  instrument  diagrams,  including  materials  of 
9)   Electrical classification 
10)  Safety systems 
11)  Applicable design codes and standards, and 
12)  Design basis for relief and ventilation systems. 
 Issue Date:    Revision Date:     Revision         Page 7 
  06/01/99         06/03/99       Number: 2 
When  important  information is not  available  from  the  design 
documents, it will be developed through special projects  or,  in 
the  case of operating p 
arameters, during process hazard analyses 
of the process.  Many of the operating parameters are included in 
the  operating procedures to help with the safe operation of  the 
process. These documents are used: 1) to train employees;  2)  to 
perform  process  hazards analyses, and 3) to help  maintain  the 
equipment.  These procedures are currently under review. 
Process Hazard Analysis 
Gary  Williams Energy prepared a Process Hazard Analysis to  help 
ensure  that  hazards associated with the various  processes  are 
identified and controlled.  Within this program, each process  is 
systematically  examined  to identify  hazards  and  ensure  that 
adequate controls are in place to manage these hazards. 
The  Bluebell Gas Processing Plant primarily used the hazard  and 
operability   (HAZOP)  analysis  technique   to   perform   these 
evaluations.   HAZOP analysis is recognized as one  of  the  most 
systematic   and  thorough  hazard  evaluation  techniques.   The 
analyses  are conducted us 
ing a team of people who have operating 
and  maintenance  experience, as well as  engineering  expertise. 
This  team  identifies and evaluates hazards of the  process,  as 
well  as accident prevention and mitigation measures and the team 
makes  suggestions  for additional prevention  and/or  mitigation 
measures when the team believes such measures are necessary. 
The Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) team findings are forwarded  to 
local and corporate management for resolution.  Implementation of 
mitigation  options in response to PHA findings  is  based  on  a 
relative  risk  ranking assigned by the PHA team.   This  ranking 
helps  ensure  that  potential accident  scenarios  assigned  the 
highest   risk   receive  immediate  attention.    All   approved 
mitigation  options in response to PHA team findings are  tracked 
until  they are completed.  The final resolution of each  finding 
is documented and retained. 
To  help  ensure that the process controls and/or process hazards 
do  not eve 
ntually deviate significantly from the original design 
safety  features, the plant periodically updates and  revalidates 
the   hazard  analysis  results.   These  periodic  reviews   are 
conducted at least every five years and will be conducted at this 
frequency   until  the  process  is  no  longer   operating.    A 
revalidation  of the current PHA will occur in  June  2000.   The 
results  and  findings from these updates will be documented  and 
retained.  Once  again,  the  team  findings  are  forwarded   to 
management  for  consideration and the final  resolution  of  the 
findings is documented and retained. 
 Issue Date:    Revision Date:     Revision         Page 8 
  06/01/99         06/03/99       Number: 2 
Operating Procedures 
The   Bluebell   Gas  Processing  Plant  will  maintain   written 
procedures that address various modes of process operations, such 
    Unit Start-up 
    Normal Operations 
    Temporary Operat 
    Emergency Shutdown 
    Normal shutdown 
    Initial start-up of a new process 
These  procedures  can  be  used as a  reference  by  experienced 
operators  and  provide a basis for consistent  training  of  new 
operators.   These  procedures  will  be  reviewed  and  annually 
certified as current and accurate.  The procedures are to be kept 
current  and  accurate by revising them as necessary  to  reflect 
changes through the management of change process. 
In  addition,  the  Bluebell Gas Processing Plant  will  maintain 
Operating  Procedures,  which will provide  guidance  on  how  to 
respond   to  upper  or  lower  limit  exceedances  for  specific 
processes or equipment parameters.  This information, along  with 
written  operating  procedures,  will  be  readily  available  to 
operators in the process unit and for other personnel to  use  as 
necessary to safely perform their job tasks. 
To  complement the written procedures for process operations, the 
Gas   Processing  Plant   will   be   implementing   a 
comprehensive  training  program for all  employees  involved  in 
operating a process.  New employees receive basic training in gas 
plant  operations  if  they are not already  familiar  with  such 
operations.  After successfully completing this training,  a  new 
operator  is  paired with a qualified operator to learn  process- 
specific duties and tasks. 
After   operators  demonstrate  (e.g.,  through   tests,   skills 
demonstration)  having adequate knowledge to perform  the  duties 
and  tasks  in  a  safe  manner  on  their  own,  they  can  work 
independently.   All  of  this training is  documented  for  each 
operator,  including the means used to verify that  the  operator 
understood  the  training.  Documentation is  maintained  at  the 
Plant, which certifies on-the-job experience for each operator. 
 Issue Date:    Revision Date:     Revision         Page 9 
    06/03/99       Number: 2 
The  Bluebell Gas Processing Plant uses contractors to supplement 
its   workforce  during  periods  of  increased  maintenance   or 
construction  activities.  Because some contractors  work  on  or 
near  process  equipment, the plant is developing  procedures  to 
ensure that contractors: 
    Perform their work in a safe manner, 
    Have the appropriate knowledge and skills, 
    Are aware of the hazards in their workplace, 
    Understand what they should do in the event of an emergency, 
    Understand and follow site safety rules, and 
    Inform  gas plant personnel of any hazards they find  during 
    their work. 
This is accomplished by providing contractors with: 
    A process overview, 
    Information about safety and health hazards, 
    Emergency response plan requirements, and 
    Safe work practices prior to their beginning work. 
In  addition, the plant evaluates contractor safety programs  and 
performance  during  the sel 
ection of a  contractor.   Gas  plant 
personnel  periodically monitor contractor performance to  ensure 
that contractors are fulfilling their safety obligations. 
Pre-Startup Safety Reviews (PSSR) 
CFS  conducts a (Pre-Startup Safety Reviews) PSSR for  any  major 
facility  modifications  that require a  change  in  the  process 
safety  information.   The  purpose  of  the  Pre-Startup  Safety 
Reviews  (PSSR)  is  to ensure that safety features,  procedures, 
personnel  and equipment are appropriately prepared  for  startup 
prior to placing the equipment into service. 
This   review  provides  one  additional  check  to  ensure  that 
construction is in accordance with the design specifications  and 
that  all  supporting systems are operationally ready.  The  PSSR 
review  team uses checklists or startup procedures to verify  all 
aspects of readiness. 
A PSSR involves field verification of the construction and serves 
as  a  quality assurance function by requiring verification  that 
t    prevention   program   requirements   are    properly 
 Issue Date:    Revision Date:     Revision         Page 10 
  06/01/99         06/03/99       Number: 2 
Mechanical Integrity 
The  Bluebell  Gas  Processing  Plant  is  developing  Mechanical 
Integrity  (MI)  practices and procedures  to  maintain  pressure 
vessels, piping systems, relief and vent systems, controls, pumps 
and   compressors  and  emergency  shutdown  systems  in  a  safe 
operating condition.  The basis aspects of this program include: 
    Conducting training, 
    Developing written procedures, 
    Performing inspections and tests, 
    Correcting identified deficiencies, and 
    Applying quality assurance measures. 
In combination, these activities form a system that maintains the 
mechanical integrity of the process. 
Maintenance personnel receive training on: 
    An overview of the process, 
    Safety and health hazards, 
maintenance procedures, 
    Emergency response plans, and 
    Applicable safe work practices to help ensure that they  can 
    perform their jobs in a safe manner. 
Written  procedures  help ensure that  work  is  performed  in  a 
consistent  manner and provide a basis for training.  Inspections 
and  tests  are performed to help ensure that equipment functions 
as  intended  and  to verify that equipment is within  acceptable 
limits (e.g., adequate wall thickness for pressure vessels).   If 
a deficiency is identified, employees will correct the deficiency 
before placing the equipment back into service (if possible),  or 
a  management of change team will review the use of the equipment 
and  determine  what  actions are necessary to  ensure  the  safe 
operation of the equipment. 
Another  integral  part of the MI program is  quality  assurance. 
The  Bluebell Gas Processing Plant incorporates quality assurance 
measures into equipment purchases and repairs.  This helps ensure 
that  new  
equipment is suitable for its intended use  and,  that 
proper materials and spare parts are used when repairs are made. 
 Issue Date:    Revision Date:     Revision         Page 11 
  06/01/99         06/03/99       Number: 2 
Safe Work Practices 
The Bluebell Gas Processing Plant adopted CFS Safe Work Practices 
standards to help ensure worker and process safety.  Examples  of 
these include: 
    Control of the entry/presence/exit of support personnel, 
    A  lockout/tagout  procedure to ensure isolation  of  energy 
    sources for equipment undergoing maintenance, 
    A  procedure for safe removal of hazardous substances before 
    process piping or equipment is opened, 
    A permit and procedure to control spark-producing activities 
    (i.e., hot work), and, 
    A  permit and procedure to ensure that, adequate precautions 
    are in place before entry into a confined space. 
These  procedures (and others), along with trai 
ning  of  affected 
personnel,  form  a  system to help ensure  that  operations  and 
maintenance activities are performed safely. 
CFS maintains a Safe Work Practices Manual as a guidance document 
to  promote  employee safety, comply with applicable safety  laws 
and  regulations,  eliminate  injuries,  and  prevent  accidental 
Management of Change 
A comprehensive system to manage changes to all covered processes 
is  under  preparation for the Bluebell Plant.  This system  will 
require   that  changes  to  items  such  as  process  equipment, 
chemicals,  technology (including, process operating conditions), 
procedures,  and other facility changes be properly reviewed  and 
authorized before being implemented.  Changes are reviewed to: 
    Ensure that adequate controls are in place to manage any new 
    hazards, and 
    Verify  that existing controls have not been compromised  by 
    the change. 
Affected  hazard  information,  process  operating  limits,   and 
information,  as  well as procedures  are  updated  to 
incorporate   these   changes.   In   addition,   operating   and 
maintenance personnel are provided any necessary training on  the 
Incident Investigation 
CFS  promptly  investigates  all incidents  that  result  in,  or 
reasonably  could  have resulted in, a fire/explosion,  flammable 
gas  release,  major  property  damage,  environmental  loss   or 
personal  injury.  The goal of each investigation is to determine 
the  facts and develop corrective actions to prevent a recurrence 
of the incident or a similar incident. 
 Issue Date:    Revision Date:     Revision         Page 12 
  06/01/99         06/03/99       Number: 2 
The   investigation   team  documents  its   findings,   develops 
recommendations to prevent recurrence, and forwards these results 
to  gas plant management for resolution. Corrective actions taken 
in   response   to   the   investigation   teams   find 
ings   and 
recommendations are tracked until they are complete.   The  final 
resolution  of each finding or recommendation is documented,  and 
the   investigation  results  are  reviewed  with  all  employees 
(including  contractors) who could be affected by  the  findings. 
Incident  investigation reports are retained  for  a  least  five 
years  so  that  the  reports can be reviewed during  future  PHA 
Compliance Audits 
To   help   ensure  that  the  accident  prevention  program   is 
functioning  properly,  the Bluebell Gas  Processing  Plant  will 
periodically conduct an audit to determine whether the procedures 
and  practices  required by the accident prevention  program  are 
being implemented. 
Compliance  audits are conducted at least every three  (3)  years 
for  each  relevant CFS facility.  Both Operations and  Corporate 
staff personnel may participate as audit team members.  The audit 
team develops findings that are forwarded to gas plant management 
for  resol 
ution.   Corrective actions taken in  response  to  the 
audit  team's findings are tracked until they are complete.   The 
final resolution of each finding is documented, and the two  most 
recent audit reports are retained. 
The  processes at the Bluebell Gas Processing Plant have  hazards 
that  must  be  managed to ensure continued safe operation.   The 
following is a description of existing safety features applicable 
to  prevention of accidental releases of regulated substances  in 
the facility. 
Universal Prevention Activities 
The accident prevention program is applied to the entire Bluebell 
Gas  Processing  Plant.  Collectively, these  prevention  program 
activities  help prevent potential accident scenarios that  could 
be caused by equipment failures and human errors. 
Specialized Safety Features 
CFS has safety features on many units to help: 
    Contain/control a release, 
    Quickly detect a release, and 
    Reduce the consequences o 
f (mitigate) a release. 
 Issue Date:    Revision Date:     Revision         Page 13 
  06/01/99         06/03/99       Number: 2 
The  following types of safety features are used in  the  covered 
l    Release  detection:   Hydrocarbon  and  H2S  detectors  with 
l    Release  containment/control:  Process  relief  valves  that 
    discharge to atmosphere. Valves to permit isolation  of  the 
    process (manual or automated).  Automated shutdown systems for 
    specific   process  parameters  (e.g.,  high  pressure   and 
    temperature).  Curbing or diking to contain liquid  releases 
    around condensate, lean oil, and EG tanks.  Atmospheric relief 
    Release   mitigation:  Fire  suppression  and  extinguishing 
    systems.   Fire  water hydrants for specific process  units. 
    Trained  emergency response personnel.  Personal  protective 
    equipment (e.g., fire retardant protective  
Five Year Accident History 
The  Bluebell  Gas  Processing Plant has an excellent  record  of 
accident prevention over the past five years.  There have been no 
accidents  or  incidents  in the past five  years,  resulting  in 
offsite effects. 
Emergency Response Program Information 
The  Bluebell Gas Processing Plant maintains a written  emergency 
response program, which is in place to protect worker and  public 
safety,  as  well  as the environment.  The program  consists  of 
procedures  for responding to a release of a regulated substance, 
including  the possibility of a fire or explosion if a  flammable 
substance  is accidentally released.  The procedures address  all 
aspects  of  emergency response, including proper first  aid  and 
medical  treatment for exposures, evacuation plans and accounting 
for   personnel  after  an  evacuation,  notification  of   local 
emergency response agencies and the public, if a release  occurs, 
and post-incident cl 
eanup and decontamination requirements. 
In  addition,  the plant has procedures that address maintenance, 
inspection and testing of emergency response equipment (SPCC Plan 
Procedures),  as  well as instructions that address  the  use  of 
emergency  response  equipment.  Employees  receive  training  in 
these procedures as necessary to perform their specific emergency 
response  duties. The emergency response program is updated  when 
necessary, based on modifications made to gas plant processes  or 
other CFS facilities.  The emergency response program changes are 
administered  through  the  Plant Supervisory  approval  process, 
which  includes informing and/or training affected  personnel  in 
the changes. 
The  overall  emergency response program  for  the  Bluebell  Gas 
Processing  Plant  is coordinated with the Duchesne  County  LEPC 
located  in Duchesne, Utah.  This coordination includes  periodic 
meetings   of  the  committee,  which  includes  local  emergency 
response  officials,  
local government  officials,  and  industry 
 Issue Date:    Revision Date:     Revision         Page 14 
  06/01/99         06/03/99       Number: 2 
The  Bluebell Gas Processing Plant has communications  capability 
with   appropriate   LEPC   officials  and   emergency   response 
organizations (e.g., Duchesne LEPC).  This provides  a  means  of 
notifying  the public of an incident, if necessary,  as  well  as 
facilitating quick response to an incident. 
Planned Changes to Improve Safety 
CFS  is committed to operating the Bluebell Gas Processing  Plant 
in  a  safe  manner for workers, the public, and the environment. 
CFS  will  be  extensively reviewing and  assessing  the  present 
safety  programs  at the Plant.  It is anticipated  that  several 
modifications and updates will be necessary for many of the Plant 
documents.   Document  revisions will be  incorporated  into  the 
Plant's   Process  Safety  Information  
as  soon  as  it  becomes 
In  the  event  improvements in safety can  be  realized  through 
auditing  efforts, actions are planned and instituted to  respond 
to  safety  enhancements of operating practices. Improvements  to 
safety are a continual process at the Plant.
Click to return to beginning