Kansas River Intake and Presedimentation Facility - Executive Summary

| Accident History | Chemicals | Emergency Response | Registration | Source | Executive Summary |

Introduction 
Water District No. 1 of Johnson County operates a water treatment plant which draws water from both the Missouri and Kansas Rivers.  The Hansen Water Treatment Plant consists of Facility No. 1, which is a 55 million gallon per day, lime-softening plant; and Facility  No. 2, which is a 110 million gallon per day, lime-softening plant.  Facility No.2 contains two separate chemical process areas.  In addition to the plant, there are two intake and presedimentation facilities, one at the Missouri River and one at the Kansas River.  These facilities will be covered in three separate Risk Management Plans.  One plan will cover the facilities at the Hansen Water Treatment Plant, and there will be a plan for each of the intake facilities.  
 
This Risk Management Plan (RMP) covers the Section 112r regulated substances maintained at the Kansas River Presedimentation and Intake Facility, which will be referred to herein as the Facility. 
 
Facility Description 
The Facility maintains onl 
y one regulated substance on site: chlorine.  Chlorine storage is 6,000 pounds, which exceeds the RMP threshold quantity of 2,500 pounds.  The storage and management of chlorine is addressed in this RMP.   
 
The Facility is located at 8715 Holliday Drive, Kansas City, Kansas, which is in an urban area.  
 
The Worst Case Release Scenario 
The worst case release scenario for the Facility was calculated as the release of the largest container of chlorine in accordance with the definition provided in the Environmental Protection Agency guidance for RMP development.  Passive control systems can be considered for the worst-case release, such as the containment provided by a building.  The conditions of the scenario, such as release time and weather status are those provided in the EPA Off-Site Consequence Analysis Guidance. The area of potential impact was determined using RMP*Comp, modeling software developed by the EPA. 
 
The results of the Off-Site Consequence Analysis indicated that the chlo 
rine would travel approximately 0.9 miles under the specified weather conditions before dispersing in the atmosphere to the specified end point concentration.  Within that radius of the Facility, an estimated 1050 persons could potentially be affected.  Maps of the area and a list of the types of receptors in the potential impact area are provided in the Off-Site Impact Analysis Section.  The list of potential receptors includes: 
 
7 a recreation area 
7 two major industrial areas 
 
This type of rapid release would only occur if the chlorine cylinder valve was broken off, or the cylinder was breached.  The likelihood of such an incident occurring is minimal.   
 
Alternative Release Scenario 
The alternative release scenario is, by definition, a more likely release scenario than the worst case.  Engineered controls, such as the leak detection system and alarm, and scrubbers installed at the site are considered in the analysis.   
 
The type of system failure selected for the alternative releas 
e was the loss of chlorine due to a break in the flexible tubing leading from the cylinder to the vacuum regulator.  The chlorine would leak from a 3/8" opening.  The leak would continue until the chlorine detection alarm sounded and the valve on the cylinder could be closed.  Scrubbers would remove 99.999% of the chlorine from the air before it leaked outside the building.  Because chlorine would have leaked into the chlorine room, response would be made by HazMat Response according to their procedures for a toxic chemical release.  The time for the response was estimated at 60 minutes.  Once on site, the HazMat team would enter the room in protective clothing and close the valve on the leaking cylinder. 
 
The results of the Off-Site Consequence Analysis using RMP*Comp, indicated that the chlorine would travel approximately 0.1 miles under the specified weather conditions in order to disperse in the atmosphere to the specified end point concentration.  Within that radius of the Facilit 
y, it is estimated that less than five persons are affected.  Maps of the area and a list of the types of receptors in the potential impact area are provided in the Off-Site Impact Analysis Section. 
 
Process Hazard Assessment 
A process hazard assessment was performed on the chlorine system beginning with the unloading of the container and ending with the chlorine in solution.  A checklist and a modified "What if" analysis were used.  In the checklist analysis, general questions regarding the storage and use area, as well as protocols associated with the management of the chlorine system, were answered.  A copy of that checklist is included in this plan.  Following the checklist, each valve, line, and piece of equipment was assessed from the cylinder to point of chemical injection using a system flow diagram.  The valves and other points in the system where the chemical could be released are numbered on the flow diagram. The assessment is formatted in accordance with those numbers.  Com 
pliance with code requirements, potential failures, maintenance and inspection concerns, and standard operating procedures were reviewed for each point in the system.  Comments are summarized in the Process Hazard Assessment section. 
 
Prevention System 
The Facility has an operation, maintenance and inspection system designed to review each element of the chlorination system routinely.  There are Operation and Maintenance manuals for each major piece of equipment, and personnel receive significant training before being allowed to work on the system. 
 
As each cylinder is changed, the valves and flexible whip connection of the chlorine system are tested for leaks.  There are standard operating procedures (SOPs) for startup, shutdown, normal operation, and emergency operation.  The SOPs are written and posted in the appropriate areas.  Personnel are trained routinely on safety concerns and general operation procedures as well as emergency procedures.  The system is equipped with chlorine d 
etectors and alarms that indicate leaks. 
 
Emergency Response Plan 
Any response requiring entry in a dangerous atmosphere requiring Level A personal protection or use of a chlorine repair kit is to be managed by Haz-Mat Response Inc., an emergency response company located in the Kansas City area.  A complete copy of the Emergency Response Plan (Emergency Action Plan) is included.    
 
Accident History 
The Facility has had no chlorine releases in the past five years.
Click to return to beginning