GenCorp Performance Chemicals, Chester Plant - Executive Summary

| Accident History | Chemicals | Emergency Response | Registration | Source | Executive Summary |

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: 
 
This document was prepared as part of the Risk Management Plan (RMP) for the Chester facility of the Performance Chemicals Division of GenCorp Inc. The RMP conforms to the legal requirements established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The purpose of this RMP is to: 
 
7 Describe existing safety systems at the Chester facility that are designed to protect employees, community, environment, and assets; 
7 Share information with the community about plant operations including steps taken to minimize risk from regulated substances and response to emergency conditions 
7 Comply with the applicable EPA regulations:  40 CFR Part 68. 
 
The following executive summary presents an overview of the Chester facility's accident prevention and emergency response programs. 
 
GENCORP'S COMMITMENT TO SAFETY: 
 
GenCorp and its Chester operations are and always have been committed to safe operations as a high priority. The commitment begins with qualified people and is refle 
cted in all levels of the operation.  All employees at the plant are given the training, tools, and empowerment to perform their part of the operation in a safe manner.    Strict operational controls are in place to ensure a safe facility from the conceptual design stage through the final delivery of products to customers.  Chester has a staff of Safety and Environmental Professionals, Engineers, and Security personnel to assure implementation of an ongoing commitment to the highest standards of safe process management.  This experience and professional competency has resulted in many years of safe operations consistently exceeding the industry average. 
 
DESCRIPTION OF REGULATED PROCESSES: 
 
GenCorp Performance Chemicals, Chester Plant has three regulated processes.  One process uses 50% Formaldehyde Solution (49% Water) in the production of permanent press finishing resins for the Textiles industry. These resins are non-hazardous clear liquids.  Ethylenediamine is used in the productio 
n of polyamide resins for the Graphics industry. These polyamide resins are non-hazardous solids.  Vinyl Acetate is used in the production of latex polymers for the Paper, Textiles, and Non-wovens industries.  These latex polymers are non-hazardous white liquids (water based). 
 
5 YEAR ACCIDENT HISTORY: 
 
The EPA regulations require regulated facilities to provide information for all accidental releases from regulated processes that resulted in (1) deaths, injuries according to the RMP definition, or significant property damage on site, or, (2) known offsite deaths, injuries, evacuations, sheltering in place, property damage, or environmental damage. 
 
No accidents meeting this regulatory definition have occurred at the Chester facility within the last five years. 
 
HAZARD ASSESSMENTS: 
 
As part of the EPA regulations, Process Safety Management requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and the Chemical Manufacturers Association Responsible Care commitment, Ge 
nCorp is required to conduct Hazard Assessments of its regulated processes. The Risk Management regulation also specifically requires offsite consequence analyses in the form of Worst-Case Scenarios and Alternative Release Scenarios for certain regulated substances. 
 
GenCorp is concerned that these Worst-Case Scenarios, required to be disclosed under the regulation, may overstate the risk of a worst case release.  For example, the EPA published lookup tables do not take any local physical conditions into account.  An alternative to the lookup tables (allowed by the regulation) is to calculate release scenarios based upon recognized risk analysis techniques, or "models."  Limited consideration of local conditions is used in the models within strict EPA guidelines.  Accordingly, GenCorp uses the EPA recognized models in preparing it's release scenarios. While these models may be more accurate, they can still result in highly improbable and in some cases physically impossible risk scenari 
os.  For example, neither lookup tables nor models allow for consideration of existing active safety devices such as in-place sprinkler systems to reduce the potential severity of an accidental release.     The use of  models increases the number of specific data points examined and, thus, presents more accurate information using all required inputs. 
 
GenCorp has also prepared Alternative Release Scenarios which it believes are more accurate predictions of potential accidental releases from the Chester facility.  Alternative Release Scenarios are by definition more likely to occur than the Worst-Case Scenarios but are still very improbable due to engineering and administrative controls in the facility's prevention program.   
 
 
WORST-CASE RELEASE SCENARIO: 
 
EPA regulations require facilities to develop one Worst-Case scenario to represent all toxic substances and one Worst-Case scenario to represent all flammable substances from a list of regulated materials.  Additional Worst-Case Sc 
enarios are required if different public receptors (off site residences, businesses or community buildings within a possible impact radius) could be affected by the release of another regulated material.  GenCorp is not subject to this additional requirement. 
 
When examining the following Worst-Case and Alternative Release Scenarios, it is important to keep in mind that GenCorp has numerous preventative measures in place at its Chester facility to effectively prevent these situations.  These measures, most of which were not taken into consideration under EPA regulations, include leak detection systems, continuous monitoring, automated controls, emergency shutdowns, secondary containment and employees specially trained in handling these materials and in emergency response methods. 
 
Flammable Materials 
The Chester facility uses none of the 63 listed flammable substances above the regulated threshold.   
 
Toxic Materials 
The Chester facility only uses three of the 77 regulated toxic substa 
nces on site above the regulatory threshold.  These are 50% Formaldehyde Solution, Ethylenediamine, and Vinyl Acetate. 
 
GenCorp's Worst-Case Scenario for a regulated toxic substance is the release of the entire contents of a Vinyl Acetate railcar.  This scenario assumes that there is no containment of the material and that the entire contents of the railcar would spill and vaporize.  It also assumes, unrealistically, that facility employees would do nothing to mitigate the release to limit the amount that is evaporated to the atmosphere.  GenCorp does not think that this worst-case is likely and may not be possible due to the conservative assumptions required by the regulation. 
 
ALTERNATIVE RELEASE SCENARIOS: 
 
Applicable EPA regulations also require facilities to submit one alternative release scenario to represent all flammable substances and one to represent each toxic substance.  
 
Flammable Alternative 
The Chester facility does not use any of the listed flammable substances above th 
e regulated threshold.   
 
Toxic Alternatives 
The facility is required to submit three alternative scenarios, one for each of the three toxic substances listed above. 
 
The Alternative Release Scenario for Vinyl Acetate involves failure of a pressurized pipeline which would result in spraying material outside the storage containment area.  
 
The Alternative Release Scenario for Formaldehyde involves failure of a tank truck unloading hose, resulting in a release of 50% Formaldehyde Solution from the hose. 
 
The Alternative Release Scenario for Ethylenediamine involves failure of a transfer line or gasket which would result in the material being released outside the storage containment area. 
 
ACCIDENTIAL RELEASE PREVENTION PROGRAM: 
 
GenCorp's Chester facility began a formal Process Safety Management Program in 1992 when OSHA promulgated '29 CFR 1910.119.  Process Safety Management in concert with effective engineering design, Employee Safety Programs, Chemical Manufacturers Association Respo 
nsible Care, and Emergency Response Programs make up the Chester Plant's Accident Release Prevention Program. 
 
EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM: 
 
GenCorp's overall safety efforts consist of measures to prevent the release of hazardous materials, as well as programs to mitigate the effects of a release should it occur.  GenCorp has a trained and equipped emergency response team capable of handling foreseeable emergency situations.  Coordination with local emergency response agencies is a key element of the emergency response planning process.  Specific plans are in place to respond to chemical emergencies within the facility. 
 
PLANNED CHANGES TO IMPROVE SAFETY: 
 
Intrinsic safety is a key element in the design of all process equipment and systems at GenCorp's Chester facility.  All covered process equipment design and modification is subject to formal hazard analysis procedures.  During a hazard analysis, key recommendations are made for improvement to the process.  Application of new design  
principles to existing equipment is a key element of continuous process safety improvement. 
 
Continued training and planned drills will sustain and improve emergency response capabilities.    
 
In 1999, an earthen dam will be installed below the rail spur where Vinyl Acetate rail cars are unloaded to provide for containment of the entire contents of a rail car to significantly reduce the potential impact of the disclosed Worst-Case Scenario.
Click to return to beginning