City of Tampa - Howard F. Curren AWTP - Executive Summary

| Accident History | Chemicals | Emergency Response | Registration | Source | Executive Summary |

1. Accidental release prevention and emergency response policies: 
 
At the Howard F. Curren Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant (HFC AWTP), both chlorine and sulfur dioxide are handled at levels above the EPA threshold.  The quantity of chemicals stored at the plant make it necessary to observe certain safety precautions in handling to prevent unnecessary human exposure, to reduce the threat to personal health as well as co-workers, and to reduce the threat to nearby members of the community.  It is the policy of the HFC AWTP to adhere to all applicable Federal and state rules and regulations. Safety depends upon the manner in which chlorine and sulfur dioxide are handled, combined with the safety devices inherent in the design of this facility, the safe handling procedures that are used, and the training of personnel. 
 
The HFC AWTP's accidental release prevention program involves a unified approach that integrates technologies, procedures, and management practices.  All applicable proc 
edures of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Prevention Program are adhered to.  The HFC AWTP's emergency response plan includes procedures for notification of the local fire authority and notification of any potentially affected neighbors. 
 
2. The stationary source and regulated substances handled. 
 
  -  The regulated substances handled at this facility are chlorine and sulfur dioxide. 
 
  -  The primary purpose of this facility is to treat the wastewater from the City of Tampa Service Area. Both       chlorine and sulfur dioxide are received by 90-ton rail cars and stored at either the chlorine unloading station or the sulfur dioxide unloading station.  Access to the site is restricted to authorized facility employees, authorized management personnel and authorized contractors. 
 
  -  The maximum amount of chlorine that can be stored at this plant is 270,000 pounds (lbs); however, the average daily amount is 115,000 pounds. The maximum amount of sulfur dioxide  
that can be stored at this plant is 270,000 pounds; however, the average daily amount is 115,000 pounds. 
 
3. The worst-case release scenario(s) and the alternative release scenario(s), including administrative controls and mitigation measures to limit the distances for each reported scenario. 
 
Worst-Case Release Scenario: 
 
  -  Worst-Case Scenario - EPA states that "the owner shall assume that the  maximum quantity in the largest vessel  is released as a gas over 10 minutes."  At the Howard F. Curren Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant, this would be the failure of the largest sulfur dioxide storage vessal.  When filled to the greatest amount allowed, the scenario would release 180,000 pounds of sulfur dioxide.   
 
  -  Atmosperic dispersion modeling was performed to determine the distance traveled by the sulfur dioxide released before its concentration decreases to the "toxic endpoint" selected by EPA.  The maximum centerline downwind distance up to which the EPA "toxic endpoint" o 
r "level of concern concentration" of 3 parts per million per volume (ppm) was determined to be 16.0 miles using EPA's RMP*Comp modeling program.  The "level of concern concentration" is defined by EPA to be the "maximum airborne concentration below which it is believed that nearly all individuals could be exposed for up to one hour without experiencing or developing irreversible or other serious health effects or symptoms which could impair an individual's ability to take protective action."  The RMP*Comp model assums the same weather conditions throughout the entire area of concern.  The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) believes that the long time and distance of travel makes steady meteorological conditions unlikely and results are not sufficiently representative of expected conditions when the distance is greater then 6.2 miles. 
 
  -  No mitigation was considered. 
 
  -  The residential population within the 16-mile radius defined above is 910,000 people.  Ho 
wever, only the population within an elliptical plume extending downwind of the release point is potentially affected.  The plum area is approximately 6% of the area of the full circle.  The data source used for this estimate was the Pinellas County 1997 census data and the Hillsborough County 1998 projected census data. 
 
Alternative Release Scenario:  
 
  -  Alternative Scenario - EPA states that the scenario shall be "more likely to occur than the worst-case release  and that it will reach an endpoint off-site."  At the HFC AWTP, this would be the release of sulfur dioxide or chlorine through a 1-inch hole in the pipe, possibly due to a broken line.  Both the sulfur dioxide and chlorine systems have excess flow valves that will shut off the flow into the system when the flow reaches 15,000 pounds per hour (lbs/hr).  Therefore, the maximum flow in the system is 250 pounds per minute (lbs/min).  For sulfur dioxide, the scenario would release 2,500 pounds over an average of 10-minutes. 
For chlorine, the scenario would also release 2,500 pounds over an average of 10-minutes. 
 
  -  Atmospheric dispersion modeling was performed to determine the distance traveled by the sulfur dioxide or chlorine released before its concentration decreased to the "toxic endpoint" selected by EPA.  The maximum centerline downwind distance up to which the EPA "toxic endpoint" or "level of concern concentration" of 3 ppm for sulfur dioxide was determined to be 0.5 miles.  For chlorine, the maximum centerline downwind distance up to which the EPA "level of concern concentration" of 3 ppm was also determined to be 0.5 miles.  This release has the possibility of extending beyond the facility boundary. 
 
  -  Three types of passive mitigation were considered for these scenarios.  Both alternative release scenarios could occur within an enclosed building.  Plus, both of the buildings have drains and ventilation.  
 
  -  The residential population within the 0.5 mile radius defined above is zer 
o.  The area immediately surounding the HFC AWTP is industrial.  The data source used for this estimate was the Hillsborough County 1998 projected cencus data.   
 
4. The general accidental release prevention program and the specific prevention steps.  
 
The Howard F. Curren Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant's general accidental release prevention program complies with EPA's Accidental Release Prevention Rule and with all applicable state codes and regulations. 
 
The HFC AWTP's general accidental release prevention program contains four parts: designing for safety, maintaining safe operations, operating safely, and auditing our operations. 
 
Designing for safety: 
 
  -  Rail car construction meets federal guideline 49CFR179.102 
  -  Excessive-flow check valve prevents rapid release of rail car contents 
  -  Redundant or backup safety systems are part of design 
  -  Remote sensing device to detect leaks 
  -  Valves and equipment are tagged and numbered 
 
Maintaining safe operations: 
 
 
 -  Safety reviews for all changes 
  -  Maintenance personal trained on the job by standards set by the Chlorine Institute 
  -  Preventative maintenance program conducted by qualified technicians 
  -  Equipment checked on a routine schedule 
  -  Frequent walk through inspections by maintenance personnel  
 
Operating safely: 
 
  -  Written operating procedures and operational standards based on hazard analysis 
  -  Established shut down procedures 
  -  Standby generator available for backup power 
  -  Leak sensors monitored in control room 
  -  Operators present during loading and unloading of rail cars 
 
Auditing our operations: 
 
  -  Critical equipment/instrumentation tested and inspected weekly to assure proper operation 
  -  Pre-startup safety reviews on new or modified equipment  
  -  Process hazard analysis conducted regularly  
  -  Design changes reviewed for proper design  
  -  Investigation and follow up of all accidents and incidents 
 
5. Five-year accident history. 
 
 
The Howard F. Curren Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant has not had a reportable accident in five years. 
 
6. The emergency response program. 
 
This Howard F. Curren Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant's emergency response program is based upon training and preparation. 
 
  -  Written plant site Emergency Preparedness Plan 
  -  On site inspection of Facility by Hazmat Team 
  -  Emergency response equipment including self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) and chemical suits located on site 
  -  All chlorine and sulfur dioxide operators trained in emergency response and emergency plant shutdown procedures 
  -  Chlorine and sulfur dioxide unloading site and procedures inspected by manufacturer's Technical Support Specialist 
  -  Member of District VIII Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC) 
 
The HFC AWTP is a first responder.  This means that the treatment plant employees respond to chlorine and sulfur dioxide releases.  If a release were to occur, the facility would also cal 
l 911, which would contact Tampa Fire Rescue, Office of Emergency Management, and the LEPC.  The HFC AWTP also has a facility wide alarm and response network monitored by a SCADA computer system.  The facility site alarm would activate to warn on-site personnel, and emergency remote shutdown procedures in place would be activated.  If the release were to have the potential to affect the general public, the Office of Emergency Management would sound an alarm for the area.  We have discussed this program with the District VIII Local Emergency Planning Committee and Tampa Fire Rescue.  
 
7. Planned changes to improve safety. 
 
The Howard F. Curren Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant is considering installing automatic close valves on the tank cars that would automatically close the valve if a leak were detected.  This would lessen the amount of chemical release that could occur during the alternative release scenario.  In this case, the maximum centerline downwind distance up to which the E 
PA level of concern concentration of 3 ppm would remain on-site.  This facility has also considered building an enclosure to secure both the sulfur dioxide and chlorine railcars.  This would lessen the maximum centerline downwind distance up to which the EPA "level of concern concentration" of 3 ppm would be observed.  With an enclosure, the "level of concern concentration" was determined to be 9.9 miles.
Click to return to beginning