Village Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant - Executive Summary

| Accident History | Chemicals | Emergency Response | Registration | Source | Executive Summary |

                      EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 
 
The VILLAGE CREEK WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT (VCWWTP) is owned and 
operated by the CITY OF FORT WORTH (CFW).  To comply with the 
requirements in 40 CFR 68 Chemical Accident Prevention Provisions, the 
CITY OF FORT WORTH WATER DEPARTMENT (CFWWD) developed a Risk 
Management Program (RMProgram) for the VCWWTP including Management 
System, Hazard Assessment, Accidental Release Prevention Program, and 
Emergency Response Plan.  The RMProgram main goal is to reduce the 
employee and public risk of injury, death or damage from accidental 
release of chemicals. 
 
1    MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 
 
The CFW has the overall responsibility for implementing and 
integrating the ARPProgram into their organization.  In accordance 
with the Management System, the CFWWD Director is designated as the 
RMProgram Director, and the Assistant Water Director in charge of 
Production is the RMProgram Manager.  Other qualified individuals are 
assigned responsibility for implementing each i 
ndividual requirement 
set forth in the Accidental Release Prevention Program and/or 
Emergency Response Plan.  The RMProgram participants include the 
following positions: 
 
A.   RMProgram Director 
B.   RMProgram Assistant Director 
C.   RMProgram Manager 
D.   Hazard Assessment/Offsite Consequence Analysis Update Officer 
E.   Safety Information Officer 
F.   Hazard Review Update Officer 
G.   Operations Manager 
H.   Training Supervisor 
I.   Maintenance Supervisor 
J.   Compliance Audit Officer 
K.   Incident Investigation Officer 
L.   Emergency Planning and Response-Operations Officer 
M.   Emergency Planning and Response-Safety Officer 
N.   RMPlan Update Officer 
 
Management system detailed descriptions and procedures are provide in 
the Accidental Release Prevention Program to ensure every participant 
playing a role in the RMProgram understands their responsibilities. 
 
2    REGULATED CHEMICALS AND PROCESSES 
 
Regulated toxic chemicals and processes at the VCWWTP are: 
 
A.   Storage, transfer and  
use of chlorine in the chlorination system 
B.   Storage, transfer and use of sulfur dioxide in dechlorination 
    system 
 
Chlorine gas is stored as pressurized liquid in three (3) side-by-side 
tanks located outdoors.  Maximum liquid chlorine inventory in each 
tank is 44,000 lbs.   The maximum process quantity is 132,000 lbs., 
ignoring negligible quantities in the piping. 
 
Sulfur Dioxide gas is stored as a pressurized liquid in two (2) side- 
by-side tanks located outdoors.  Maximum liquid chlorine inventory in 
each tank is 44,000 lbs.   The maximum process quantity is 88,000 
lbs., ignoring negligible quantities in the piping. 
 
3    HAZARD ASSESSMENT 
 
The Hazard Assessment has been completed for the VCWWTP.  Offsite 
consequence analysis modeling was performed based on the following 
principle elements: 
 
A.   Meteorological parameters for the dispersion modeling analysis 
    were determined using National Weather Service data collected at 
    the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport. 
 Highest daily 
    maximum temperature and average relative humidity over the last 
    three-year period were used for worst-case scenarios.  Typical 
    meteorological conditions based on the data over the last  
    three-year period were used for alternative release scenarios. 
 
B.   Total quantity in the single largest tank was used for chlorine 
    and sulfur dioxide worst-case scenarios.  A leak from a liquid 
    line near the outdoor storage tank was assumed for either 
    chlorine or sulfur dioxide alternative release scenario. 
 
C.   No mitigation measure was considered in worst-case scenarios.  
    The excess flow valve, however, was considered for either 
    chlorine or sulfur dioxide alternative release scenario. 
 
D.   Distances to toxic endpoints for chlorine and sulfur dioxide 
    worst-case scenarios were modeled using a dense gas dispersion 
    model, DEGADIS. 
 
E.   Distance to the toxic endpoint for the chlorine and sulfur 
    dioxide alternative scenarios we 
re modeled using a dense gas 
    dispersion model, ALOHA. 
 
F.   Distance to the flammable endpoint for methane scenario was 
    determined using a TNT-equivalent model. 
 
G.   Offsite impact was evaluated with LANDVIEW III for each release 
    scenario. 
 
The accidental release of sulfur dioxide from a storage tank is 
considered the worst-case scenario. A distance of 5.3 miles between 
the release source and the toxic endpoint was modeled in the offsite 
consequence analysis.  The alternative scenario impact distance is 1.3 
miles for sulfur dioxide and 1.2 miles for chlorine. 
 
For the worst-case scenario, LANDVIEW III estimated a population of 
220,000 persons within the worst-case scenario impact radius of 5.3 
miles.  Populations are 5,400 and 3,300 persons for sulfur dioxide and 
chlorine alternative release scenarios, respectively. 
 
Public receptors within the worst-case scenario impact area include 
schools, residences, hospitals, correctional facilities, recreation 
areas and commercia 
l, office, or industrial areas.  Public receptors 
within the alternate release scenario impact area are schools, 
residences, recreation areas and commercial, office, or industrial 
areas.  No environmental receptors are within the impact area of the 
worst-case scenario. 
 
4    ACCIDENTAL RELEASE PREVENTION PROGRAM 
 
A comprehensive Accidental Release Prevention Program Manual was 
developed. The main purpose of the manual is to provide operation and 
maintenance personnel detailed standard procedures to reduce employee 
and public risk to injury, death or property damage from accidental 
chemical releases.  The manual includes the following elements and 
complies with requirements set forth in 40 CFR 68 Chemical Accident 
Prevention Provisions. 
 
A.   Management 
B.   Safety Information 
C.   Hazard Review 
D.   Operating Procedures 
E.   Training 
F.   Maintenance 
G.   Compliance Audits 
H.   Incident Investigation 
 
Detailed procedures for the Accidental Release Prevention Program were 
developed and  
are undergoing implementation and integration into 
routine operation and maintenance practices at the VCWWTP.  Historical 
and future significant efforts focus on the following areas: 
 
A.   Development of a safety information database essential for the 
    successful implementation of other procedures, including 
    operation, maintenance, training, compliance audits, incident 
    investigation, and emergency planning and response. 
 
B.   Implementation of corrective actions recommended during the most 
    recent hazard review completed on April 22, 1999.  This effort is 
    one of the most important steps for preventing a chemical release 
    or minimize its effects on plant personnel or the public. 
 
C.   Regular review and revision of operating procedures to address 
    the safely operating procedures for regulated process systems, 
    including all eight (8) elements set forth in the regulation.  
    When combined with the operator training program, current 
    operating pro 
cedures are essential in  ensuring safe operation of 
    systems and preventing accidental releases. 
 
D.   Regular review and revision of training programs to ensure plant 
    personnel working on or near regulated processes are adequately 
    trained and understand both inherent process hazards and 
    appropriate response actions to accidental chemical releases.  
    Employees who have received adequate classroom and/or on-the-job 
    training and are currently qualified to safely operate the 
    regulated systems have received certifications  in writing by the 
    RMProgram Manager.  A special training session will be provided 
    to plant personnel working on or near regulated processes as soon 
    as final revisions to operating procedures are completed. 
 
E.   Regular review and revision of the maintenance program to ensure 
    that current, accurate, and complete procedures are provided for 
    process equipment in regulated processes.  Efforts were and are 
    conti 
nuously made for the preventative maintenance of equipment 
    per manufacturer's recommendations.  Effective maintenance 
    procedures are integral to preventing chemical releases that may 
    result from mechanical failure of improperly maintained 
    equipment. 
 
5    THE FIVE-YEAR ACCIDENT HISTORY 
 
No accidental releases of regulated chemicals from a regulated process 
at the VCWWTP has occurred in the past five years resulting in any 
death, injury, or property damage on site, or known offsite impacts 
(i.e., deaths, injuries, evacuations, sheltering-in-place, or property 
damages, or environmental damages). 
 
6    EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN 
 
CFWWD personnel do not respond to uncontrolled releases of chemicals 
from any regulated process at the VCWWTP.  Plant employees are limited 
to responding only to incidental releases covered by maintenance 
procedures.  Appropriate procedures have been developed and are in 
place that provide clear instructions on 1) how to determine if a leak 
is co 
nsidered an incidental release, and 2) how to notify local 
emergency responders in the event of an uncontrolled release.  Current 
procedures were reviewed and revised to meet regulatory requirements, 
such as emergency notification, evacuation, training, documentation, 
availability, etc., under 29 CFR 1910.38(a).  Regulated processes at 
the VCWWTP are not included in the community emergency response plan 
developed under 42 U.S.C. 11003.  The local emergency responder is 
the Emergency Management Office in association with the City of Fort 
Worth Fire Department.  Adequate safety information regarding 
regulated processes has been provided to the Emergency Management 
Office who has developed and implemented specific emergency response 
plans, provided suitable training, and conducted necessary drills in 
emergency response for regulated chemical releases from regulated 
processes.  Although it will not be the responsibility of the plant 
employees to evacuate offsite areas, addresses and teleph 
one numbers 
of major public receptors inside a one (1) mile radius are provided in 
the plan.  The CFWWD will work closely with the Emergency Management 
Office and document coordination activities and communications. 
 
7    ON-GOING AND UP-COMING SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS 
 
To improve the safety of regulated facilities at the VCWWTP, the 
following plant expansion, process modification and facility upgrade 
projects are under construction or are scheduled to begin soon: 
 
A.   Continuing revision and implementation of operational, 
    maintenance, and training procedures. 
 
B.   Inclusion of O&M manuals, equipment listings, plant drawings and 
    other pertinent information on the Plant Intranet Site available 
    to personnel with access to the Village Creek server.
Click to return to beginning