Water Treatment Plant #3 - Executive Summary

| Accident History | Chemicals | Emergency Response | Registration | Source | Executive Summary |

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 
 
I. Weber Basin Water Conservancy District (WBWCD), Water Treatment Plant #3 is located at 2837 E. Hwy 193, Layton, UT.  The plant handles 8000-lb of chlorine, which exceeds the OSHA threshold quantity.  The plant maintains a process safety management (PSM) program that entails the emergency response and emergency prevention procedures.  The accidental release prevention policy involves an integration of procedures, management practices, and technologies.  The emergency response policy involves procedures specifically designed for this plant.   
 
II. Weber Basin Water Conservancy District Plant #3 is a water treatment facility that uses chlorine as part of its treatment process. The chlorine is only used in the water treatment process to disinfect the effluent culinary water.  The water mainly serves the North Davis County area as far south as Farmington.  The chlorine storage room contains the chlorine cylinders and the chlorination room, next to the chlorine storage  
room, contains the chlorinators and instrument panel.  The various safety equipment is stored in the room adjacent to the chlorination room.  Four 2,000-lb cylinders are typically stored at this facility.  Two of the cylinders are connected to the system while two remain on standby.  This facility is manned 24 hrs/day 7 days/week Technicians at the plant routinely check the chlorine system and respond promptly to the alarms that might occur. 
 
III. An offsite analysis was done based on two scenarios, the first being a worst-case release scenario and the second being an alternative release scenario.  The worst-case scenario was set and defined by the EPA as the quantity contained in the largest vessel released as a gas over a ten-minute period caused by an unspecific failure.  The alternative release scenario is based on a more realistic accidental release at the facility. 
 
For each of the scenarios above, the distance traveled by the released chlorine until it reaches its toxic endpoint 
must be known.  The EPA has set the toxic endpoint as 3 ppm (0.0087 mg/l) which is the Emergency Response Planning Guideline Level 2 (ERPG 2).  The residential population that reside within a circular area with a radius corresponding to the toxic endpoint distance has to be estimated to determine the population potentially affected by the accidental release. 
 
The worst-case scenario selected for Plant #3 entails a complete failure of one of the 2,000-lb chlorine tank.  The hazard assessment analysis for this scenario was done according to the pre-set EPA conditions.  These conditions include the following: 
A. Release of the entire quantity of gas over ten minutes. 
B. Use of the ERPG 2 toxic endpoint level. 
C. Population potentially affected based on a circular area with a radius corresponding to the toxic endpoint distance. 
D. Atmospheric stability class F. 
E. Wind speed of 1.5 m/sec. 
F. Temperature of 77oF. 
G. Humidity of 50%. 
 
An atmospheric dispersion model was performed using thes 
e input parameters. A supplementary manual to the Risk Management Programs 40 CFR Part 68 made especially for chlorine gas was prepared and distributed by Jim Peterson from Region 8 of the EPA.  Using the reference table given in this manual, a toxic endpoint distance of 0.9 miles was found for this scenario. The residential population potentially affected using the EPA assumptions is 4125. 
 
IV.    The accidental release program established by WBWCD is in compliance with OSHA PSM and EPA RMP rules.  The program includes detection alarms set at a sensitivity of 1 ppm, ventilation system, extensive training of employees and routine equipment checks.  Safety equipment is readily accessible and employees are trained to respond to potential failures and accidental releases.  Davis County Emergency Response Committee is aware of the hazardous chemical storage and the associated hazards.  Incase of larger releases of chlorine, plans with the county emergency response have been implemented for ev 
acuation of the potentially affected areas. 
 
V.    Over the past five years, this plant has had no accidental releases that have resulted in serious onsite or offsite injuries, death, or damages.  There is one case of a minute release of chlorine gas that resulted in minor respiratory problems for one employee.  The release was due to a valve being open prior to the tank being sealed.  There was no hospitalization due to the release. 
 
VI. The source has an emergency response plan, which is coordinated with the Layton City Fire Department. Layton City Fire Department is not a fully equipped Hazmat facility, but is capable of responding to a chlorine release.  Layton City Fire Department will assist in the evacuation of residents that may be potentially affected.
Click to return to beginning