IBP, inc. - Executive Summary |
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Accident Release Prevention Program and Emergency Response Policy It is the policy of the IBP, inc. (IBP) Storm Lake, Iowa, facility management to implement the requirements of this Risk Management Program (RMP) in accordance with the USEPA regulations under 40 CFR Part 68 and with the corresponding regulations under OSHA's Process Safety Management (PSM) program. The objective is to minimize the risk of a release of a hazardous material and if a release occurs, to minimize the potential impact to IBP employees, the public and the environment. This objective will be accomplished by utilizing general good operating procedures, providing appropriate training to all employees, and coordinating response activities, as necessary, with the local emergency response providers. This plan covers all IBP owned activities at this facility. IBP's management is committed to providing the resources necessary to implement this policy. Facility Description IBP operates a hog slaugh ter and processing facility at this location. Hogs are trucked to the facility, slaughtered and fabricated. IBP operates rendering systems to produce meat scraps, lard, grease and dried blood. Support operations include a wastewater treatment system, truck repair facilities, cold storage, an analytical laboratory, and administrative offices. Two chemicals are utilized at the facility in sufficient quantities to be subject to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 68. These chemicals are chlorine and ammonia. Chlorine is used as a disinfectant to treat wastewater and ammonia is used as a refrigerant throughout the facility. Worst-Case and Alternative-Release Scenarios RMP regulations require that each facility identify worst-case and alternative case release scenarios. EPA has defined a worst-case release as the release of the entire contents of the largest vessel that contains a regulated substance in a 10-minute period. This release rate is then evaluated using modeling techniques and/o r reference tables to define the distance to a specified endpoint (concentration or overpressure). The distance to the endpoint is affected by several factors including molecular weight, volatility, heat of combustion, and physical setting (urban or rural). The alternative release scenario must be one that is more likely to occur than the worst-case scenario and that reaches an endpoint offsite, unless no such scenario exists. The alternative release scenario is also evaluated to define the distance to the specified endpoint. Under 40 CFR 68 Subpart B ?68.22(e), the RMP rule identifies surface roughness as a parameter to be used in the hazard assessment to determine the physical setting of the site, urban or rural. "Urban means there are many obstacles in the immediate area; obstacles include buildings or trees. Rural means there are no buildings in the immediate area and the terrain is generally flat and unobstructed." Due to the presence of trees, hills, and/or other structures i n the immediate vicinity of the Main Plant facility, an urban dispersion environment was assumed. For the Wastewater Treatment Plant, a rural dispersion environment was assumed due to the lack of trees, hills, and/or other structures in the immediate area. The Storm Lake, Iowa facility has a chlorine system and two separate ammonia refrigeration systems. The chlorine system is located at the facility's wastewater treatment plant and the ammonia systems are located at the main complex. The two ammonia systems are the Main Plant and MQC refrigeration systems. The larger ammonia system is in the MQC refrigeration system. The worst-case release area for the MQC system would contain the area impacted by the worst-case release for the Main Plant ammonia system. Since the main complex and the wastewater treatment plant are separate facilities, two worst-case toxic releases were specified for the entire facility. Chlorine The dispersion model applied to the worst-case and alternative chl orine release scenarios was the EPA-approved model, HGSYSTEM. HGSYSTEM is a consequence model that has seven distinct modules that are used to predict the potential ambient concentrations resulting from single (gas) and two-phase jet (gas and aerosol) releases from pressurized vessels, vapor releases, liquid spills and the subsequent evaporation of the spill pool. HGSYSTEM was selected for this application because of its flexibility in simulating the necessary release characteristics, plume dispersion (e.g., dense gas dispersion), and its capability of simulating the dispersion environment through which the plume travels (e.g., time varying meteorological conditions). The worst-case release scenario for chlorine included a release of all the contents of the storage vessel (2,000 pounds) in a 10-minute period. This release translates to a release rate of 200 lbs/min. Other assumptions for the worst-case chlorine analysis include the chlorine is a liquefied gas; the 1-ton cylinder is not diked; no passive mitigation system (including buildings) are in place; the nearfield dispersion environment is characterized as rural; 10-minute averaging period; the windspeed is 1.5 meters/sec and the atmospheric stability is classified as F (stable). The results of the worst-case assessment for chlorine show that the regulatory defined endpoint of 3.0 ppm is found to occur at a distance of 3.23 miles (5.2 kilometers) from the release point. The selected alternative-release scenario for the chlorine system is a release resulting from a fusible plug failure that leads to the release of the entire contents of the 1-ton chlorine cylinder. Based on information in the Chlorine Institute Chlorine Handbook, the release rate of vaporized chlorine from the fusible plug opening is an average of 14.6 lbs/min. Based on the calculated release rate of 14.6 lbs/min, the duration of a 2,000-pound release is 136 minutes. The model assumes no active or passive mitigation measures are current ly in place. The meteorological data used for this alternative release scenario was a wind speed of 3 meter/sec, an atmospheric stability classification of D (neutral stability), and a rural dispersion environment in the nearfield. The results of the alternative-release scenario for a chlorine release indicates that the endpoint of 3.0 ppm is reached at a downwind distance of 0.31 miles (500 meters) from the release point. Ammonia The data provided in the document "Model Risk Management Program and Plan for Ammonia Refrigeration" (May 1996) was used to estimate the toxic endpoint distance for the worst-case and alternative ammonia release scenarios. The EPA's "RMP Off-site Consequence Analysis Guidance" (May 1996) was not used to determine the toxic endpoint since it classifies ammonia as a neutrally buoyant gas. Since the worst-case ammonia release would involve liquid and would come from a pressurized system containing liquid, the released gas should be classified as a dense gas (a result of evaporative cooling). The ammonia refrigeration document provides calculated endpoint distances for typical meteorological conditions. The worst-case release scenario for an anhydrous ammonia release included a release of all the contents of the Low Pressure Recirculator in a 10-minute period (per EPA guidelines). This release translates to a release of 54,152 pounds of ammonia in 10 minutes or 5,415.2 lbs/min. Other assumptions included in the worst-case assessment are: the ammonia is a liquefied gas; the Low Pressure Recirculator is not diked; the release does not take place indoors; the nearfield dispersion environment is characterized as urban; 10-minute averaging period; the wind speed is 1.5 meters/sec and the atmospheric stability is classified as F (stable). The results of the worst-case assessment for ammonia show that the plume must travel 2.59 miles (4.18 kilometers) before dispersing to the endpoint concentration of 201 ppm. The selected alternative-release scenario for the ammonia systems is a release from a relief valve due to overpressure of a compressor unit. The largest relief valve in the system was used in this scenario. The largest relief valve has a relief rate of 419.3 pounds of air per minute. As a matter of convention, the specified release rate of any relief valve is always in pounds of air per minute. The release rate of 419.3 pounds of air per minute correlates to a release rate of 297.4 pounds of ammonia vapor per minute. This release rate was applied to a release from the ammonia header on top of the building. The ammonia refrigeration document provides calculated endpoint distances for typical meteorological conditions (3 m/s wind speed, D atmospheric stability, 50% relative humidity). It has been determined, through a review of IBP's operational history, that the total release would likely be 500 pounds of ammonia. Based on the release rate of 297.4 lbs/min, the duration for a 500-pound release is 1.7 minutes. Other assumptions include that no active or passive mitigation measures are currently in place and an urban dispersion environment in the nearfield. The results of the alternative-release scenario for an ammonia release indicates that the endpoint concentration of 201 ppm is reached at 0.22 miles (350 meters) from the release point. General Accidental Release Prevention Program and Chemical Specific Prevention Steps The Storm Lake, Iowa facility is governed by a set of OSHA and USEPA regulations that require planning and facility activities intended to prevent a release of hazardous material, or if a release inadvertently occurs, to minimize the consequences of a release to the employees of the facility, the public and to the environment. These regulations include: * 40 CFR Part 68, Accidental Release Prevention * 40 CFR Part 112, Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure * 40 CFR Part 264, Hazardous Waste Contingency Plan * 29 CFR Part 119, Process Safety Management * 40 CFR Part 302, Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) The key concepts in IBP's release prevention program are employee participation, appropriate design and maintenance of equipment, and appropriate training of all employees. IBP has developed and documented these elements in their process safety management plan (PSM). The PSM plan is incorporated with this document by reference. Employee participation in the release prevention program is encouraged and supported by IBP management. Key personnel are responsible for conducting and implementing the findings from the Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) for the ammonia and chlorine systems. IBP employees are also members of the facility emergency response team. IBP policy is to construct all new equipment, systems, and facilities to ensure the appropriate safety and release prevention systems are included from the beginning of each project. IBP maintains a computerized program of maintenance activities to ensure that key systems are maintained appropriately to minimize the risk of a release. IBP is committed to providing appropriate training to all employees regarding safety procedures. Each new employee is provided comprehensive safety training during their initial orientation for the facility. In addition, IBP conducts regularly scheduled safety training for all employees each year. Additional training is provided to maintenance personnel for the systems they are responsible for. Members of IBP's emergency response team receive annual training to ensure that response actions are promptly and safely completed. Five Year Accident History On August 19, 1997, IBP had a release of ammonia from the Storm Lake, Iowa facility that resulted in one OSHA recordable injury. The release did not affect the public or the environment. The release was small and did not require an incident investigation. Therefore, IBP does not have records of the time and duration of the release or the release quantity. IBP has assum ed, after reasonable inquiry, the time of the incident is 12:00 PM, lasted one minute, and released one pound of ammonia. Emergency Response Program IBP has personnel trained in emergency response at the facility 24 hours per day, seven days per week. These personnel receive annual training on emergency procedures and response techniques. Planned Changes to Improve Safety IBP completes a thorough review of the ammonia systems and chlorine systems each time a design change is implemented. IBP is committed to using these methods to identify and implement ways to improve the safety of these systems. |