Borden Chemical, Inc. Hope Plant - Executive Summary

| Accident History | Chemicals | Emergency Response | Registration | Source | Executive Summary |

Executive Summary 
 
 
 
1.Accidental release prevention and emergency response polices 
 
As stated in our Worldwide Health, Safety, and Environmental Policy and Principles, Borden Chemical, Inc. is committed to health, safety, and environmental excellence.  To accomplish this we integrate health, safety, and environmental planning into all business activities.  This includes complying with applicable laws, responsibly managing risks, and working collaboratively with others in addressing health safety, and environmental issues. 
In the Borden Chemical, Inc. Safety Manual, the Safety Policy Statement clearly states that safety will not be compromised to achieve any other operational or business objective.  This manual defines requirements and guidelines developed to prevent injuries and accidental releases.  
Included in the Safety Manual is Emergency Response Polices that states that safety is the top priority in all emergency response situations.  This policy refers to the plant's Emergency  
Response Plan for specific procedures for handling releases of hazardous materials.  
 
2. Stationary source and regulated substances handled 
 
This plant is a fully integrated facility which makes phenol-formaldehyde resins, urea-formaldehyde resins, formaldehyde solutions, and petroleum wax emulsions.  Formaldehyde has a wide variety of uses as a feedstock for many chemical products as well as the resins that we produce onsite.  Aqua ammonia is also used as a raw material for certain resins.  The resins are primarily used in manufacture of forest products such as particleboard, medium density fiberboard, plywood and oriented strand board.  Other resin uses include other building products such as fiberglass roofing shingles and fiberglass insulation. 
 
3. Worst-Case release scenarios and alternative release scenarios 
 
Worst Case Release Scenario - Formaldehyde  
 
Temperature controls fail while making a batch of phenol-formaldehyde resin.  As a result, the heat of reaction boils the reacto 
r contents until the pressure reaches 5 psig, when the installed rupture discs burst.  Pressure inside the reactor forces vapor and liquid through the rupture disc vent piping, discharging water vapor, formaldehyde vapor, and liquid resin into the atmosphere.  The distance to the EPA toxic endpoint of 0.012 mg/m3 is 1.6 miles.  The duration of the exposure is seven minutes. 
 
 
 
Alternative Release Scenario ? Formaldehyde 
 
As a result of a bottom unloading valve failure, 25,000 gallons of formaldehyde spills from a rail car, which is waiting to be shipped.  This formaldehyde flows via a concrete ditch into a containment pit, from which it can be pumped to a storage tank. The distance to the toxic endpoint of 0.12 mg/m3 is 0.17 miles.  Due to the low odor threshold of formaldehyde, the spill would be quickly discovered. 
 
Worst Case Release Scenario ? Aqua Ammonia 
 
The bulk storage tank of aqua ammonia fails, and spills its entire contents within the diked containment area, from which it  
can be pumped into a storage tank or trucks.  The distance to the toxic endpoint of 0.014 mg/m3 is 2.0 miles.  The duration of exposure is ten minutes. 
 
Alternate Release Scenario ? Aqua Ammonia 
 
As a result of piping failure, the contents of a full truckload of aqua ammonia (50,000 pounds) is spilled into the truck containment area, from which it can be pumped to a storage tank..  The distance to the toxic endpoint of 0.014 mg/m3 is 0.2 miles.  The duration of exposure is 50 minutes. 
 
4. Accidental release prevention program and chemical specific prevention steps 
 
This plant has a comprehensive process safety management program that is in compliance with the EPA Accidental Release Prevention Rule, the OSHA Process Safety Management Standard, and all applicable state codes and regulations.  A safety management system is in place to assure on-going compliance.  This management system includes the Safety Manual, a list of site safety responsibilities, a file system to maintain records of 
compliance, and monthly Health, Safety, & Environmental Steering Committee meetings, where a management control checksheet is used to verify that tasks were completed on schedule.  The Plant Manager has overall responsibility for this program. 
Process Stewards are assigned to maintain and improve the safety of their units.  Their duties include keeping operation procedures up-to-date; training operating technicians so they can safely follow theses procedures; assuring that the plant is run safely on a daily basis; and, when necessary, investigating incidents in their unit. All employees participate in the safety program to improve safety and plant operation. 
 
Each Process Steward maintains an Operating Guide that includes process safety information, operating procedures, equipment information, process safety information, mechanical integrity information, and a training certification program. Operating technicians use this Operating Guide as a training tool and for reference. By applyi 
ng the information it contains their actions prevent accidental releases. 
 
Process hazard analyses are conducted to identify hazards and recommend safeguards that prevent a release. As a result of initial process hazard reviews, a significant investment was made in process control systems.  Several control interlocks are installed to insure safety, including an automatic deluge system for phenolic resin production. Should a batch become unstable, this system floods the reactor with water, diluting the reactants while removing excess heat.  It operates either automatically based on control system monitoring of the process, or manually by the technician. 
 
Two methods are used to assure that changes to plant equipment, procedures, or processes do not cause accidents. For equipment and procedure changes, the Management of Change System in Lotus Notes initiates a safety review. New capital equipment is reviewed as part of the Investment Proposal system.  This review may include a process ha 
zard analysis or other safety reviews.   
Changes to product formulations initiate a review by a regulatory affairs specialist, a formulation chemist, a process engineer, and the plant manager. Training is then performed as needed to assure that those affected by the change understand its impact. In addition, Pre-Start-up Safety Reviews are performed to assure that the plant can be started up and operated safely after a significant change is made. 
 
A preventive maintenance program maintains the mechanical  
integrity of process  
equipment. A computer database is used to manage the preventive  
maintenance schedule.  Periodically, scheduled equipment inspections, tests, or servicing are performed. The schedule is based on plant experience to reduce the likelihood of an accidental release caused by equipment failure, and may include weekly, monthly, quarterly, and yearly inspections and maintenance. 
 
The requirements in the Safety Manual include safe work practices  
which prevent  
accidenta 
l releases. One important section describes safety  
measures for welding or other  
"hot" work, which includes a Hot Work Permit system to reduce the risk of  
fire. The Safety Manual  
also includes requirements for locking out and tagging out equipment for  
maintenance. These procedures  
reduce the likelihood that a valving error will lead to a  
release. 
 
Contractors who perform work in the plant are  
given safety orientations on plant hazards and safety practices. Contractor  
safety programs and  
performance are evaluated prior to their selection for jobs that  
impact process safety using the Contractor Screening Form. 
 
Incidents that cause or could have caused a release are  
investigated and their root cause determined.  Actions are taking to prevent recurrence. These actions may include  
improvements in  
equipment, procedures, operating conditions, or training. 
 
Periodically a safety professional from another Borden Chemical location conducts a 
comprehensive audit of the safety progr 
am.  Addressing recommendations from this audit keeps the safety program effective. 
 
5. Five-year accident history 
There has been one spill at the plant which resulted in a release of formaldehyde off of the plant site in excess of the reportable quantity.  This occurred in 1996 at the formaldehyde rail car loading area.  Investigation revealed that the top flange on a cartridge filter was not tightened sufficiently, allowing formaldehyde solution to spray onto a gravel area adjacent to the rail car area. 
As a result, lids are used which fit over the top flange of the filters, so that if there is a leak it is deflected downward and retained in the concrete diked area. 
There have been no incidents involving ammonia. 
 
 
6.  Emergency response program 
 
The plant operating staff is trained in Hazard Communication, First Aid, and fire prevention as a part of Borden's Safety Program.  In addition, Borden has a contractual agreement with Cusa Environmental, Inc., to provide a well-trained and  
equipped Emergency Response Team should an upset condition exceed the capabilities of plant personnel. This team is available on a 24 hour, seven day a week basis. 
 
 
.   
7.  Planned changes to improve safety 
No changes are planned at this time.
Click to return to beginning