Water Treatment Plant - Executive Summary

| Accident History | Chemicals | Emergency Response | Registration | Source | Executive Summary |

                      RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN 
 
                  FOR CHLORINE HANDLING AT THE 
 
                     WATER TREATMENT PLANT 
                     BROKEN ARROW, OKLAHOMA 
 
 
 
                  IN COMPLIANCE WITH 40 CFR 68 
 
 
 
                           JUNE 1999 
 
 
 
                      CITY OF BROKEN ARROW 
 
                    PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 
 
 
 
                       EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 
 
a.   The City of Broken Arrow Public Works Department accidental release prevention 
    policy involves a unified approach that integrates technologies, procedures, and 
    management practices.  All applicable procedures of the U.S. Environmental 
    Protection Agency (EPA) Prevention Program are adhered to.  The City of Broken 
    Arrow Public Works Department emergency response policy involves the 
    preparation of response plans which are tailored to each facility and to the 
    emergency response services available in the community, and is in compliance with 
    t 
he EPA Emergency Response Program requirements. 
 
b.   The Water Treatment Plant has been installed to treat the flow of potable drinking 
    water in the City of Broken Arrow.  This water serves the City of Broken Arrow.  The 
    chlorination station is located on Kenosha Street in Wagoner County.  The station 
    includes a chlorination room, which contains liquid chlorine containers, a 
    chlorinator, and various safety equipment, and an instrument room, which contains 
    a flow recorder, various electrical panels, and additional safety equipment.  The 
    amount of chlorine handled is two one-ton containers.  The facility is normally 
    manned during regular working hours, with employees living on site and an on call 
    system is available.  Water treatment operators work in the facility daily and 
    respond to any trouble area which may occur. 
 
c.   The offsite consequence analysis includes consideration of two chlorine release 
    scenarios, identified as "worst cas 
e release" and "alternative scenario".  The first 
    scenario is defined by EPA, which states that "the owner or operator shall assume 
    that the "maximum quantity in the largest vessel"  is released as a gas over 10 
    minutes, due to an unspecified failure.  The alternative scenario is defined as "more 
    likely to occur than the worst-case release scenario". 
 
    Atmospheric dispersion modeling has to be performed to determine the distance 
    traveled by the chlorine released before its concentration decreases to the "toxic 
    endpoint" selected by EPA of 3 ppm which is the Emergency Response Planning 
    Guideline Level 2 (ERPG-2).  This is defined by the American Industrial Hygiene 
    Association (AIHA) as the "maximum airborne concentration below which it is 
    believed that nearly all individuals could be exposed for up to one hour without 
    experiencing or developing irreversible or other serious health effects or symptoms 
    which could impair an indivi 
dual's ability to take protective action." The residential 
    population within a circle with a radius corresponding to the toxic endpoint distance, 
    as to be defined, "to estimate the population potentially affected". 
 
    Actuation of the chorine detector is an active mitigation measure considered.  An 
    additional active mitigation system isthe building which acts as a n enclosure, with 
    the chlorine cylinder located in the basement of the facility. 
 
    d.   The general D accidental release prevention program is based on the 
    following key elements: 
 
              High level of training of the operators 
 
              Preventive maintenance program 
 
              Use of state-of-the-art process and safety equipment 
 
              Use of accurate and effective operating procedures, written with the 
              participation of the operators and owners 
 
              Performance of a hazard review of equipment and procedures 
 
e.    Implementation of an audi 
ting and inspection program. 
 
    Chemical-specific prevention steps include availability of self-contained breathing 
    apparatus (SCBA), worn by the operators during connection/disconnection of 
    chlorine supply, awareness of the hazardous and toxic properties of chlorine, and 
    presence of chlorine detectors. 
 
    No accidental releases of chlorine have occurred at this facility in the past five 
    years. 
 
f.   The facility has an emergency response program, which has been coordinated by 
    the City of Broken Arrow Fire Department.  Emergency response drills and drill 
    evaluations are conducted along with emergency operation and response 
    procedures.
Click to return to beginning