Mid Dakota Water Treatment Plant - Executive Summary
Mid Dakota Rural Water System |
Water Treatment Plant
Risk Management Plan Executive Summary
1.0 Accidental Release Prevention and Emergency Response Policies
At the Mid Dakota Rural Water System Water Treatment Plant, we are committed to operating and maintaining all of our processes in a safe and responsible manner. We use a combination of accidental release prevention programs and emergency action planning to help ensure the safety of our employees and the public, as well as protection of the environment. This executive summary provides a brief overview of the comprehensive risk management activities that we have implemented, including:
* A description of our facility and use of substances regulated by EPA's RMP regulation
* A summary of results from our assessment of the potential offsite consequences from
accidental chemical releases.
* An overview of our accidental release prevention programs.
* A five-year accident history for
accidental releases of chemicals regulated by EPA's RMP rule
* An overview of the emergency response plan we rely on.
* An overview of planned improvements at the facility to help prevent accidental chemical releases
from occurring and adversely affecting our employees, the public, and the environment.
2.0 Stationary Source and Regulated Substances
The Mid Dakota Water Treatment Plant produces safe, reliable, high quality, and economical potable water to all or part of 13 counties in east central South Dakota. In our treatment process, we use the following chemical that EPA has identified as having the potential to cause significant offsite consequences in the event of a substantial accidental release:
Chlorine is used as a disinfectant to inactivate disease causing organisms and to maintain high quality potable water during distribution and storage. The maximum inventory of chlorine that can be stored on-site in the treatment pl
ant chlorine storage room is 22,000 pounds, leaving one space for an empty container. This amount of storage was designed for the ultimate design capacity of the plant. Since we are a new facility, having started operation in 1997, we operate well below the ultimate design capacity and maintain a maximum chlorine inventory at the Water Treatment Plant of only 12,000 pounds.
Our accidental release prevention program and our contingency planning efforts help us effectively manage the hazards posed to our employees, the public, and the environment by our use of chlorine.
3.0 Key Offsite Consequence Analysis Scenarios
EPA's RMP rule requires that we provide information about the worst-case release scenario and an alternate release scenario for our facility. The following are brief summaries of these scenarios, including information about the key administrative controls and mitigation measures to limit the exposure distances for each scenario:
Worst Case Release Scenario - Regulate
d Toxic Chemical: Chlorine
The worst case scenario for the Mid Dakota Water Treatment Plant would be catastrophic failure of one full 2,000 pound container of chlorine. The worst case is assumed to be a direct release over a 10-minute period, as required by the regulation. The assumed meteorological conditions are 1.5 meters per second wind speed, atmospheric stability Class F (very stable, calm evening conditions), and rural terrain. Because the chlorine containers are always stored in an enclosed storage room, the release rate to the atmosphere is reduced from 200 lb/min to only 110 lb/min. The building enclosure provides passive mitigation of the chlorine release. Under these conditions, the EPA OCA Reference Table 11 predicts a distance of 2.2 miles to the toxic endpoint (0.0087 mg/L) of the release. The approximate population affected by this scenario is 160, based on 1990 U.S. Census data.
The public receptors within this distance include residences and public reacreation
areas. The environmental receptors within this distance include officially designated wildlife sanctuaries and refuges, federal lands, and farm fields.
Alternate Release Scenario - Regulated Toxic Chemical: Chlorine
The alternate release scenario for our facility describes a situation that would be more likely to occur than the worst case described above, and which would affect areas off-site. This scenario assumes the release of gas chlorine from a one-ton chlorine container, through a 5/16-inch diameter valve body opening, due to severed connection with the tank mounted vacuum regulator. The release duration is assumed to be 60 minutes. The container is assumed to release 900 pounds of chlorine, at a rate of 15 lb/min. Because the chlorine containers are always stored in an enclosed storage room, the release rate to the atmosphere is reduced from 15 lb/min to 8.25 lb/min. The closest release rate to 8.25 lb/min on the EPA Reference Table is 10 lb/min, so the 10 lb/min rel
ease rate is used. The building enclosure provides passive mitigation of the chlorine release. The assumed meteorological conditions are 3.0 meters per second wind speed, atmospheric stability Class D (neutral stability, overcast conditions), and rural terrain. Under these conditions, the EPA OCA Reference Table 24 predicts a distance of 0.2 miles to the toxic endpoint (0.0087 mg/L) of the release. The approximate population affected by this scenario is in the range of 0 to 30, based on 1990 U.S. Census data. The actual population is about 10.
The public receptors within this distance include residences located either adjacent to or across the road from the treatment plant. The environmental receptors include nearby farm fields.
We are using this information to help ensure that our community emergency response plan addresses all reasonable contingency cases.
Administrative controls that help prevent such releases from ever happening include proper training of all plant operator
s in the use of chlorination equipment. Two operators are used whenever work is done in the chlorine room. One operator acts as "safety observer", while the other works on the equipment. Each time a new container is connected for use, the operator performs a leak check of all the connections to assure they are secure and properly installed. We use an all-vacuum chlorine feed system, the safest type available, to deliver the chlorine from the connected containers into the treatment process. If a feed line is accidently damaged or disconnnected, the chlorine flow stops completely due to loss of vacuum. We also use specialized instrumentation that provides continuous chlorine leak monitoring of the room where the chlorine is stored. Even a small leak in the chlorine room would activate an alarm and alert the operators on duty.
4.0 General Accidental Release Prevention Program and Chemical-Specific Prevention Steps
We maintain a number of programs to help prevent accidental r
eleases and ensure safe operation. The accident prevention programs in place include:
1. Regular review of safety information such as Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS),
routine documentation of chlorine inventory, and regular updating of safety information
to assure accuracy and completeness.
2. Hazard review of the chlorination system using industry recommended checklists to assess
potential problems that could result in an accidental release, determine the safeguards needed
to control the hazards or prevent equipment malfunction.
3. Written operating procedures that address initial startup, normal operations, temporary operations,
emergency shutdown, emergency operation, normal shutdown, startup following a normal
or emergency shutdown or a major change, consequences of deviations and steps required
to correct or avoid deviations, and routine
4. Regular employee training to assure that each plant operator has the required knowledge,
skills, and abilities to safely carry out the duties and responsibilities assigned.
5. Written maintenance procedures and documentation to assure safe operation of critical
equipment. Operators routinely review these procedures prior to beginning maintenance
procedures on the chlorination equipment.
6. Compliance audits every 3 years to assure that the Mid Dakota Water Treatment Plant facility
and its operators implement the risk management program and comply with the regulations.
7. Written plan for conducting an incident investigation, should even a minor release or near-miss
5.0 Five-Year Accident History
We keep records for all significant accidental chemical releases that occur at our facility. We have
not had an accidental re
lease involving chlorine since our initial start-up in October, 1997. If an accidental
release occurs, we are fully prepared and committed to conducting a formal incident investigation to
identify and correct the root cause of the event.
6.0 Emergency Response Program
We maintain an emergency action plan, which complies with the various federal, state, and local
regulatory requirements for emergency response planning. Our emergency action plan calls for us to immediately notify the Hughes County Dispatch (dial 911) and evacuate employees to a safe location. The Hughes County Local Emergency Response Plan and the Pierre Fire Department Hazardous Materials Emergency Response Plan are then put in effect. We have coordinated our action plan with the Hughes County and Pierre emergency responders. We have also conducted a training drill with these agencies to assure that we will be prepared in the event of an actual release.
7.0 Planned Changes to Improve Safety
The following is
a list of improvements that we are planning to implement at the Mid Dakota Water
Treatment Plant to help prevent and/or better respond to accidental chemical releases:
1. We will conduct regular training drills with the Hughes County and Pierre emergency
2. We will provide more safety training and review workshops for our employees.
3. We will maintain only the minimal chlorine inventories necessary for assuring proper disinfection