Lyondell Chemical R&D Facility - Executive Summary

| Accident History | Chemicals | Emergency Response | Registration | Source | Executive Summary |

Lyondell Chemical Company 
Research & Development Facility 
Newtown Square, Pa. 
 
 
EPA RMPlan Executive Summary 
 
 
INTRODUCTION: 
 
 
SITE HISTORY 
 
Lyondell is one of the world's largest chemical companies.  The Lyondell enterprise is  
comprised of the former ARCO Chemical Company, acquired by Lyondell in 1998.   
Lyondell also has major ownership positions in Equistar Chemicals, Lyondell-Citgo Refining  
and Lyondell Methanol Company.    In total, Lyondell operates in 15 countries and has  
approximately 11,000 employees worldwide.    
 
The Newtown Square Research & Development (R&D) Facility was opened by Atlantic  
Richfield Company in 1980.  Since then, the Newtown Square facility has operated as a  
research and development center for ARCO Chemical Company (ACC).  Beginning in 1987,  
the site also became ACC's world-wide corporate headquarters. In July of 1998, Lyondell Chemical Company purchased ARCO Chemical Company and is in the process of  
relocating its corporate headquarters to Houston. 
 The site is and will continue to serve as the  
primary R&D location for Lyondell Chemical Company.  
 
 
1.0 ACCIDENTAL RELEASE PREVENTION AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE POLICIES 
 
The Lyondell Newtown Square R&D Facility is committed to operating and maintaining all  
of our laboratories and processes in a safe and responsible manner.  We have implemented a  
combination of accidental release prevention programs and emergency response planning  
programs to help ensure the safety of our employees and the public, as well as to protect the  
environment.  These programs are designed to meet or exceed governmental requirements  
such as the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Risk Management Program (RMP)  
rule (40 CFR Part 68) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA)  
Process Safety Management (PSM) Standard (29 CFR Part 1910.119).  This document is  
intended to satisfy the RMP Plan requirements of the RMP rule and to provide the public  
with a description of the risk managem 
ent program at the facility. 
 
 
2.0 STATIONARY SOURCE AND REGULATED SUBSTANCES 
 
Our facility is not a manufacturing site.  The Lyondell Chemical Company R&D Facility  
operates laboratory and pilot plant operations designed to support company manufacturing  
sites as well as develop new processes. Processes supported include propylene oxide and it's  
derivatives.  In our research and development processes, we use the following chemicals that  
the EPA has identified as having the potential to cause significant off site consequences in  
the event of a substantial accidental release: 
 
Toxics 
 
The Lyondell R&D facility stores and handles only one chemical in quantities exceeding the  
EPA defined threshold quantity:  propylene oxide.  The Polyols Pilot Plant uses propylene  
oxide to prepare experimental samples of intermediate urethane chemicals.  Propylene oxide  
is used as a reaction component to make polyols which Lyondell's customers use to make  
foam seating and mattresses, sneaker soles, 
coatings, adhesives, sealants, elastomers and  
other consumer products. 
 
Flammables 
 
The Lyondell Chemical Company R&D Facility does not handle or store any listed  
flammables in excess of the threshold quantity. 
 
 
Management systems are in place to ensure that the site optimizes the amount of chemicals  
on site by: 
 
* ordering chemicals in minimum quantities  
* maintaining accurate inventory records and sharing chemicals between different users in  
 order to avoid duplicate inventories 
* designing projects to minimize sample sizes 
* working with vendors to provide "just in time" delivery.   
 
 
3.0 KEY OFFSITE CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS SCENARIOS 
 
RMP PROGRAM LEVEL 
 
The Lyondell Chemical Company Newtown Square Research and Development Facility is  
classified as a Program 1 Process under the EPA's Risk Management Program rule 40 CFR  
68.  Program 1 Process designation indicates that although the site handles and uses a listed  
chemical above the threshold quantity, the distance to endpoint f 
or the worst case accidental  
release scenario is less than the distance to the nearest public receptor.  Additionally, the  
process has not had any accidental releases in the past five years resulting in an on-site death,  
injury, or property damage; or an off-site death, injury, evacuation, shelter-in-place,  
property damage, or environmental damage as outlined in the risk management program rule  
(40 CFR 68.10 (b)(1)). 
 
Lyondell Newtown Square performed off-site consequence analyses to estimate the potential  
for an accidental release of a regulated substance that may affect the public or the  
environment. The USEPA - RMP Offsite Consequence Analysis Guidance Document (OCA  
Guidance), dated May 24 1996, was utilized.  EPA Off-Site Consequence Analysis (OCA)  
Guidance Tables were used for evaluating the worst case scenarios and alternative release  
scenarios for flammable and toxic materials.  
 
The following is a brief summary of the worst case scenario for the only covered chemical  
at  
our site, propylene oxide.  Key administrative controls and mitigation measures implemented  
to limit the exposure distances are included with the scenario description. 
 
Worst-Case Release Scenario - Regulated Toxic Chemical : Propylene Oxide 
 
The  propylene oxide worst case scenario assumes 'instantaneous' failure of a Polyol Pilot  
Plant propylene oxide tank.  When full, the tank holds 2600 pounds of propylene oxide. The  
tank contents would be contained within a concrete dike area with a vapor release resulting  
from the evaporation of the liquid pool within the dike. The release and corresponding  
distance to endpoint (derived from EPA method) remains within the site fence line and does  
not affect any public receptors. 
 
The following 'Passive Mitigation' measure was used in this analysis: 
 
* Concrete Dike: the concrete, secondary containment dike contains the propylene oxide  
   release and minimizes propylene oxide evaporation to the atmosphere.  
 
 
Active Mitigation: 
 
By de 
finition, the worst case analysis does not allow credit to be taken for active mitigation  
systems.  However, the Polyols Pilot Plant has in place many layers of protection designed to  
prevent and if necessary, detect and respond to any spills or leaks of propylene oxide.  These  
active controls include but are not limited to the presence of OSHA PSM certified operators  
during all operating hours, the design and use of multiple automatic shutdown systems (that  
have been confirmed to be Y2K compliant) and the presence of automatic leak detection and  
fire suppression systems throughout the complex. 
 
In addition to the active mitigation systems described above, we maintain: 
 
* emergency responders and emergency management organization members on 24 hr. call 
* integrated process control and alarm systems to alert operating personnel in the process area 
  and central security 
* highly-trained emergency management personnel 
* fire-safety officers that are trained as Emergency Medic 
al Technicians 
* more than adequate supply of emergency and spill response equipment 
 
 
Worst-Case Release Scenario(s) - Regulated Flammable Chemicals 
 
The Newtown Square R&D facility does not use or store any listed flammable chemicals in  
excess of the threshold quantity.  Even though we do not use or store any listed flammable  
chemicals in excess of the threshold quantity, each process area in which listed chemicals are  
used and stored was evaluated. This information is used to help ensure that our emergency  
response plan and the community emergency response plan address all reasonable  
contingency cases. 
 
 
4.0  ACCIDENTAL RELEASE PREVENTION PROGRAM  
 
The Newtown Square R&D facility maintains programs to help prevent accidental releases  
and ensure safe operation. These individual elements of our prevention program collectively  
help prevent accidental chemical releases.  The accident prevention programs in place  
include, but are not limited to: 
 
* Written Safety Policies and P 
rocedures 
* Employee Training and Qualification Programs 
* Safety Reviews that use hazard evaluation methodologies for all new projects 
* Operational changes to existing processes that are evaluated using risk assessment and  
  hazard evaluation methods. 
* Experiments and pilot process units that are designed and built with appropriate levels of  
  safety redundancy, reflecting the hazards present.  These include such things as  
  equipment interlocks and automatic emergency shutdown systems. 
* Incident / accident reporting and investigation procedures. 
* Employee 'near miss' event reporting / resolution system. 
* Regular housekeeping and safety inspections that are conducted for all operating areas. 
 
 
 
5.0 FIVE - YEAR ACCIDENT HISTORY 
 
The site has not had any releases which resulted in an on-site death, injury, or serious  
property damage; or an off-site death, injury, evacuation, shelter-in-place, property damage,  
or environmental damage during the past five years.  In fa 
ct, since we opened this facility, in  
1980, we have not had any chemical releases with off site consequences. 
 
 
6.0 EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM 
 
We maintain an integrated contingency plan, which consolidates all of the various federal,  
state, and local regulatory requirements for emergency response planning.  Our program,  
referred to as the 'Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan' or CEMP, provides the  
essential planning and training for effectively protecting the workers, the public, and the  
environment during emergency situations.  Lyondell Newtown Square management  
coordinates our plan with the community emergency response plan through the Director of  
Emergency Services, County of Delaware, Pennsylvania.  Other community organizations  
with whom we share and coordinate the emergency plan are: 
 
* Newtown Square Volunteer Fire Company 
* Newtown Township Manger 
* Newtown Township Supervisors 
 
 
7.0 PLANNED CHANGES TO IMPROVE SAFETY 
 
As a member of the Chemical Manufacturers As 
sociation, Lyondell Chemical supports a  
continuing effort to improve the industry's responsible management of chemicals.  It is a  
policy of Lyondell (and formerly of ACC) to strive for continuous improvement in  
performance in the areas of environmental, health, and safety.   
 
For the Newtown Square site, the primary means for continuous improvement is a program  
of corporate Technical Center Standards, which consists of rigorous performance  
requirements in the areas of Process safety, Occupational Safety and Health, Environmental  
Compliance and Incident and Emergency Management.  These standards reflect the  
requirements of a R&D operating environment and help ensure superior performance and  
continuous improvement. 
 
A system of audits to measure performance against these standards with resulting  
recommendations and follow up actions are in place to assure continuous improvement in  
safely managing our operations, safety and health performance, environmental compliance  
and incid 
ent / emergency response capabilities. 
 
 
8.0     CERTIFICATIONS 
 
[Certification executed with cover letter accompanying this RMPlan submittal.] 
 
Based on the criteria in 40 CFR 68.10, the distance to the specified endpoint for the worst- 
case accidental release scenario for the following process is less than the distance to the  
nearest public receptor: 
 
* Polyols Pilot Plant 
 
Within the past five years, the process has had no accidental release that caused offsite  
impacts provided in the risk management program rule (40 CFR 68.10(b)(1)).  No additional  
measures are necessary to prevent offsite impacts from accidental releases.  In the event of  
fire, explosion, or a release of a regulated substance from the process, entry within the  
distance to the specified endpoints may pose a danger to public emergency responders.   
Therefore, public emergency responders should not enter this area except as arranged with  
the emergency contact indicated in the RMP.  The undersigned certifies that, 
to the best of  
my knowledge, information, and belief, formed after reasonable inquiry, the information  
submitted is true, accurate and complete. 
 
 
 
_________________________  Charles W. Ruoff, Facility Manager    
                                                   June 21, 1999 
 
 
9.0  RMP DATA ELEMENTS 
 
Additional information about our risk management program that EPA's RMP rule has asked  
us to provide is included as requested in the attached data file.
Click to return to beginning