Dresick Cooling - Executive Summary

| Accident History | Chemicals | Emergency Response | Registration | Source | Executive Summary |

Risk & Process Safety Management Program 
 
Executive Summary 
 
for 
 
Dresick Cooling 
19536 Jayne  
Huron, CA  93234 
(559) 954-2513 
FAX (559) 945-9627 
 
June 21, 1999 
 
Prepared by: 
 
Solutions Environmental Health & Safety, Inc. 
6687 N. Blackstone Avenue, Suite 103 
Fresno, California 93710 
(559) 435-4244 
FAX (559) 435-8503 
www.SEHS-Inc.com 
 
Table of Contents For Executive Summary 
 
1.   DRESICK COOLING RISK & PROCESS SAFETY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM   1 
2. DESCRIPTION OF AMMONIA SYSTEM   1 
3. AMMONIA RELEASE SCENARIOS   1 
3.1 WORST CASE SCENARIO   1 
3.2 ALTERNATIVE CASE SCENARIO   2 
4. GENERAL ACCIDENT RELEASE & AMMONIA SPECIFIC PREVENTION STEPS   2 
5. FIVE YEAR ACCIDENT HISTORY   3 
6. EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN   3 
7. PLANNED CHANGES TO IMPROVE SAFETY   3 
 
1.   DRESICK COOLING RISK & PROCESS SAFETY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 
This is to inform all interested persons, including employees, that Dresick Farms, Inc., is preparing a unified Risk & Process Safety Management Program to comply with California's Accidenta 
l Release Prevention (CalARP) Program (in California CCR Title 19, Chapter 4.5, Program Level 3 Elements, and Federally Title 40 CFR Part 68) and California OSHA's "Process Safety Management (PSM) of Acutely Hazardous Materials" standard (in California CCR Title 8, Section 5189, "Process Safety Management of Acutely Hazardous Materials" and Federally Title 29 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1910.119).  This program is being prepared to address the risks involved with the presence of anhydrous ammonia in an amount in excess of 10,000 lbs which is contained in our refrigeration system.  
 
Our program will promote overall plant, worker, and public safety. The program will enable our facility to prevent the occurrence, and minimize the consequences, of significant releases of anhydrous ammonia. Overall, the program is designed to prevent accidental fatalities, injuries and illnesses and avoid physical property damage. 
 
Our company has an exemplary safety record, one that we are quite prou 
d of.  Our program incorporates and brings together several existing safety programs which already set forth rules, procedures and practices which help our employees protect themselves and our neighbors. 
2. DESCRIPTION OF AMMONIA SYSTEM 
We operate a commercial packinghouse for row crops, for example lettuce and cantelopes. We store all of our packed product in cold storage.  Our facility has an ammonia system that provides refrigeration capacity to three cold rooms equipped with forced air cooling, three cold rooms for storing palleted produce, and typically three outdoor vacuum tube chillers. High pressure liquid from our main receiver is piped to each refrigerated area, where it passes through an expansion valve into a low pressure & temperature accumulator vessel.  Low temperature liquid ammonia from the accumulator vessel passes through cooling devices such as evaporator coils, where the liquid ammonia absorbs heat and vaporizes.  Low temperature & pressure gas from the cooling equ 
ipment is returned to our engine room, where it passes through a compressor.  The high pressure discharge from the compressor is sent to a water cooled condenser where the high pressure gas ammonia is liquified and returned to our receiver.  
 
The ammonia system at our facility consists of vessels which are interconnected, or which are co-located such that a release of ammonia could impact the ability to operate vessels which are not directly connected.  Therefore, we are treating our facility as a single process. 
 
3. AMMONIA RELEASE SCENARIOS 
3.1 Worst Case Scenario 
Our worst case scenario is the failure of our high pressure receiver containing 40,000 lbs of ammonia.  If this were to happen the release would be passively mitigated by the fact that the primary receiver vessel is inside our engine room. The ammonia would be released over a ten minute period. Using RMP*Comp we estimate that the ammonia would travel 2.6 miles (rural conditions) before dispersing enough to no longer pose a  
hazard to the public.  A map showing the area that would be affected is attached. 
 
In our opinion, it is extremely unlikely that the worst-case scenario will ever take place.  Our receiver meets industry standards for manufacture and quality control of pressure vessels; ammonia is not corrosive in this service; pressure safety relief valves limit the operating pressure in this vessel; and our operators are trained in the safe operation of our system.  
 
3.2 Alternative Case Scenario 
Our alternative release scenario is as follows.  A high pressure safety relief valve lifts and fails to reseat.  The rated release rate for our high pressure safety relief valve is 70 lbs/min.  We assume the leak would continue for 10 minutes until the header pipe was switched over to the backup safety relieve valve. Following industry practice, our relief valves are installed in pairs with a switch over valve, and the discharge is piped to a release point that is remote from the valve. Under this scenario 7 
00 lbs of ammonia would be released over a time period of 10 minutes.  Using RMP*Comp we estimate that the ammonia would travel 0.2 miles (rural conditions) before dispersing enough to no longer pose a hazard to the public. A map showing the area that would be affected is attached. 
 
4. GENERAL ACCIDENT RELEASE & AMMONIA SPECIFIC PREVENTION STEPS 
The ammonia refrigeration system at Dresick Farms, Inc., is an integral part of the overall business.  It has a system charge of approximately 40,000 lbs. It is extremely important that it is maintained and operated in a safe and efficient manner.  Management is committed to making sure that all employees are made aware of the potential danger of an ammonia leak. 
 
The ammonia refrigeration system/process is constantly being monitored by our refrigeration engineer.  In addition, the system/process is checked frequently by our outside refrigeration contractor, the Stellar Group, who also performs an annual pre-season preventative maintenance revi 
ew of our system/process equipment.  In addition, an outside contractor Western Precooling provides services in the startup and maintenance of the tube chillers. 
 
We inform our employees of the dangers of an accidental release of ammonia through monthly safety meetings.  During these meetings we also discuss the preventative measures to take, such as evacuation, in order to not be affected by a release. 
 
Our ammonia refrigeration system was designed and built by professional refrigeration engineers in accordance with ANSI/IIAR 2-1992 "Standard for Equipment, Design, and Installation of Ammonia Mechanical Refrigerating Systems."  It was also built in compliance with the Uniform Building Code and Uniform Mechanical Code applicable at the time of construction. 
 
Our ammonia refrigeration system is equipped with safety relief valves.  These valves limit the operating pressures of the entire system, and prevent failures due to overpressurization. 
 
5. FIVE YEAR ACCIDENT HISTORY 
Dresick Farms, 
Inc., has not had any reportable accidents in the last five years.   
 
6. EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN 
This facility's emergency response program is based on the Cal OSHA requirements for Emergency Action Plans (in California CCR Title 8, Section 3220, "Emergency Action Plans" and Federally Title 29 CFR 1910.38 and 1910.119) and HAZWOPER (standard (in California CCR Title 8, Section 5192, "Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response" and Federally Title 29 CFR 1910.120).  
 
Strategically, we will respond Defensively to a release. Under this plan our employees will take whatever steps are necessary to bring a release under control. Initial training to the defensive level (First Responder, Operations Level) as defined in the HAZWOPER regulations will take place before the end of the year.  The first priority will be to operate the ammonia system to bring a release under control safely, from a distance, without donning personal protective equipment.  Steps might include stopping the flow of 
ammonia to a leak point, or using the compressor to suck ammonia away from a leak point.  Further response requiring the donning of personal protective equipment would be done in coordination an outside agency.  All response activities would be coordinated with the local fire department and the Fresno County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Response Team. 
 
Every year at the beginning of the season we review with our employees our evacuation procedures in the event of an emergency, including an ammonia release.  We have a windsock at our facility that employees can use to determine the "upwind" side of any point of release.   
 
7. PLANNED CHANGES TO IMPROVE SAFETY 
As of June 21, 1999, the time that this Executive Summary is being submitted, our Risk & Process Safety Management Plan is not complete.  The reason is that in order to do it right a lot of work must be done.  We simply do not have enough qualified employees or resources to meet the initial deadline. Our company operates se 
asonally and we have found that our ability to allocate managerial and operator resources to prepare this plan depends upon our workload.  In addition, we have found it necessary to obtain help from outside vendors for some critical elements, such as preparing Piping & Instrumentation Diagrams and conducting a Process Hazard Analysis.  These vendors are attempting to meet the requests of numerous facilities such as ours at the same time, and have the same problem of only a limited number of people qualified to carry out the required tasks.  Thus, these vendors are setting completion dates for plan elements that we cannot entirely control. 
 
However, we have prepared the following milestones and allotted times for the completion of our plan: 
 
Milestone Allotted Time 
* Conduct Offsite Consequence Analysis -- Done 
* Prepare RMP*Submit showing status as of 6/21/99 -- Done 
* Collect Process Safety Information 60 days - By Sept 1, 1999 
* Conduct Process Hazard Analysis On or around Sept 1, 19 
99 
* Finish PHA documentation including Action List 30 days - By Oct 1, 1999 
* Prepare Process Prevention Program elements 90 days - By Oct 1, 1999 
* Prepare Standard Operating Procedures 90 days - By Oct 1, 1999 
* Compile all elements into Risk & Process Safety  
Management Program, review internally, and submit 120 days - By Nov 1, 1999 
 
We understand our obligations to consolidate our safety activities in a Risk Management Program under the CalARP regulation.  We are committed to preparing and implementing a Risk & Process Safety Management Program according to the above milestone and timeline chart.
Click to return to beginning