City of Fulton Water Pollution Control Plant - Executive Summary

| Accident History | Chemicals | Emergency Response | Registration | Source | Executive Summary |

3.0 Executive Summary 
 
 
3.1 General 
 
In accordance with 40 CFR Part 68.155, this executive summary includes a brief description of the following program elements: 
 
  The accidental release prevention and emergency response policies at the WPCP facility; 
 
  The WPCP facility and regulated substances handled; 
 
  The worst-case release scenario(s) and the alternative release scenario(s); 
 
  The general accidental release prevention program and chemical specific steps; 
 
  The five year accident history; 
 
  The emergency response program; and 
 
  Planned changes to improve safety. 
 
3.2 Accidental Release Prevention & Emergency Response 
 
The WPCP facility maintains this RMP in accordance with Section 112(r) of the CAA.  Further details regarding the WPCP accidental release prevention and emergency response policies are included in Section 7 and Appendices A and B of this RMP. 
 
3.3 WPCP and Regulated Substance 
 
As discussed in Section 1 of this RMP, the WPCP facility stores up to 4,000  
pounds of gaseous chlorine in one ton cylinders within the chlorine building.  This storage quantity exceeds the threshold quantity for chlorine of 2,500 pounds as specified in the 112(r) rule.  The chlorine gas is used at the facility in the secondary treatment of the wastewater prior to the discharge of the effluent to the Oswego River.   Figure 1 shows the location of the chlorine building. 
 
3.4 Worst Case Release Scenario 
 
In accordance with United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)'s Offsite Consequence Analysis Guidance, the worst case scenario consists of the instantaneous release of a chlorine cylinder's maximum contents (up to 2,000 pounds).  In determining this worst case scenario, the rate of the release was not considered.  Per USEPA's guidance, the release of gaseous chlorine is a passive mitigated release.  The distance to the toxic endpoint was determined to be 3.5 miles in accordance with guidelines established in USEPA's Offsite Consequence Analysis guidanc 
e document, using the release of gas in an enclosed space method.  The source location results in a radius of influence corresponding to the toxic endpoint of 0.0087 mg/l that extends beyond the property boundaries of the facility in all directions.  Using LandView. III, the residential population within the radius of influence is 19,100 persons with approximately 7,300 households.  The public receptors identified within the radius of influence were determined to be schools, residences, hospitals, public recreational areas and major commercial, office, or industrial areas.   
 
The alternate release scenario was performed assuming that the quantity of chlorine gas released was 1,000 pounds over a ten (10) minute period with a stability class of D.  The distance to the toxic endpoint was determined to be 0.81 miles.  The source location resulted in a radius of influence corresponding to the toxic endpoint of 0.0087 mg/l that extends the beyond the property boundaries of the facility in al 
l directions.  The residential population within the radius of influence was determined, using LandView. III, to be 2,500 persons with approximately 940 households.  The public receptors identified within the radius of influence were determined to be schools, residences, religious institutions, and major commercial, office, or industrial areas.  There were no identified environmental receptors within the radius of influence.  
 
3.5 General Accidental Release Prevention Program 
 
Due to the Program 3 status of the WPCP facility, the facility is required under Section 112(r) of the CAA to develop a Prevention Program. 
 
3.6 Five-Year Accident History 
 
The WPCP facility has not experienced any accidental releases of chlorine in the past five years (May 1994-May 1999). 
 
3.7 Emergency Response Program 
 
The current WPCP facility emergency response program requires coordination with local emergency response agencies, and includes provisions for public notification in the event of a release.  Fur 
ther details regarding the WPCP emergency response program are included in Section 8 and Appendix B. 
 
3.8 Planned Changes to Improve Safety 
 
The City of Fulton, being aware of the effects of an accidental release of chlorine gas at the WPCP, is working to upgrade its Prevention and Emergency Response Programs to fulfill RMP Program 3  level requirements.  The City will continue to regularly review and revise its existing operating procedures related to gaseous chlorine to ensure that the safety of WPCP employees, the general public, and the environment is protected to the fullest extent possible.
Click to return to beginning