Bunge Foods Corporation - Executive Summary

| Accident History | Chemicals | Emergency Response | Registration | Source | Executive Summary |

BUNGE FOODS CORPORATION- FORT WORTH, Texas 
 
1.EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 
Bunge Foods Corporation. (Bunge) owns and operates a fats and oils processing facility located in Fort Worth Texas.  On site, Bunge has an ammonia refrigeration system which contains anhydrous ammonia, a regulated hazardous substance, which is used for product cooling in process equipment at facility.  The maximum intended inventory of ammonia on site is above the threshold quantity listed in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) '68.130. 
 
Since the quantity of ammonia exceeds the threshold quantity, Bunge is required to implement a Risk Management Program (RMP) at the Fort Worth facility which includes three (3) major elements:  hazard assessment, prevention program, and emergency response program.  The submission of the RMPlan presents the details of the RMP compliance measures conducted by Bunge.  The required RMP information was electronically submitted to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) in  
a timely manner before the deadline of June 21, 1999. 
 
Bunge is also subject to OSHA's Process Safety Management Program (PSM).  Based on the information presented in this report, Bunge is subject to Program Level 3 requirements of the RMP regulation. 
 
Bunge is committed to maintaining compliance with the requirements of the RMP rule.  As such, Bunge will update this plan in the event of any of the following: 
7 Within 5 years of the initial submission date of June 21, 1999, 
7 No later than 3 years after a newly regulated substance is first listed by the U.S. EPA, 
7 No later than the date on which a new regulated substance is first present in an already covered process above a threshed quantity, 
7 No later than the date on which a regulated substance is first present above a threshold quantity in a new process, 
7 Within 6 months of a change that requires a revised PHA or hazard review, 
7 Within 6 months of a change that requires a revised offsite consequence analysis as provided in '68. 
36, and 
7 Within 6 months of a change that alters the Program level that applied to any covered process. 
 
1.1 Accidental Release Prevention and Emergency Response Policies 
It is the policy of Bunge Foods facility management to implement the requirements of an Emergency Action and Response Plan by managing and operating the facility in accordance with all applicable regulations and good operating practices. 
 
1.2    Description of Bunge and the Regulated Substance Handled 
Bunge operates a fats and oils processing facility in Fort Worth, TX.  Bunge produces shortenings, fats, and oils.  The ammonia refrigeration system provides the necessary cooling for manufacturing of the product.  In addition, the ammonia refrigeration system is utilized to provide cooling for product storage.  There is approximately 26,000 pounds of ammonia located within the closed-loop ammonia refrigeration system.  
 
1.3    Worst Case Scenario 
Section '68.25 of the RMP Regulation defines a worst-case scenario as a release 
of the largest quantity of a regulated substance from a vessel or process line failure that results in the greatest distance to a specified endpoint.  
 
At Bunge, the worst-case scenario is identified to be the release of the largest vessel containing ammonia.  The largest vessel (7,300 lb) is assumed to instantaneously release the entire contents in a worst-case accidental release scenario.  The ammonia will then volatilize into the atmosphere.  Modeling of this release was performed using a finite dispersion model based on the methods established by E. Palazzi et.al.  This method was used because it allowed the urban topography to be accounted for.  The toxic endpoint calculated was 0.69 miles.  This release would affect residential populations.  
 
The alternative release scenario is based on a one inch hole in a liquid ammonia line.  This failure will assume that 1,445 pounds of ammonia will released over 11.3 minutes from the roof of the facility (20 feet above ground).  Modeling of 
this release was performed using the EPA's dispersion modeling software SLAB and shows that the toxic endpoint will extend to a distance of 0.09 miles.  This release would affect the public if standing at the gaurd shack.   
 
1.4    The General Accidental Release Prevention Program and Chemical-Specific Prevention Steps 
Bunge has specific process controls in-place to minimize the risks of spills. Bunge has a preventative maintenance software program in place to address maintenance of all vital parts of the plant's day to day operations.  All inspection and testing procedures are contained within this program and are issued as required to the Bunge-personnel for completion.  In addition, there are many safety controls installed within the system.  These include an interlock system, alarms, and ammonia detectors located within the ammonia refrigeration system.   
 
1.5    Five year Accident History 
In the past five years, Bunge is proud to report that there have been no accidental releases of am 
monia as outlined in '68.42 of the RMP Regulations. 
 
1.6    The Emergency Response Program 
Bunge's emergency response policies have been designed to comply with all applicable state and federal Regulations.  These policies summarize the actions to be taken in response to a chemical spill.  In the event of a spill, the HazMat Team will react with the proper actions, as listed in the Emergency Response Plan, in association with the local fire department . 
 
1.7    Planned Changes to Improve Safety 
Bunge makes safety a first priority in its every day operations to ensure a safe working environment for all of its employees.  Bunge is committed to continuously improving the facility's safety and working practices through employee involvement and development.  To maximize the amount of safety and to make sure everything is in accordance with state, federal, and health and safety committee legislature, internal audits are performed periodically.  If the audit finds that there are instances where the 
safety standards are not followed, suggestions are made to correct the situation.  Any changes recommended as results of the audit are considered for their safety, as well as their efficiency, and if applicable, they are implemented. 
 
A Process Hazard Assessment (PHA) was recently performed at the Bunge facility.  Recommendations from that PHA are being implemented which will improve the safety of the ammonia process as well as reduce the chances and magnitude of any ammonia spill.
Click to return to beginning