SEMINOLE GAS PROCESSING PLANT - Executive Summary

| Accident History | Chemicals | Emergency Response | Registration | Source | Executive Summary |

Amerada Hess Corporation 
United States Onshore Production 
 
United States Environmental Protection Agency - Risk Management Program 
 
 
 
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 
 
CERTIFICATION LETTER 
 
Based on the criteria in 40 CFR 68.10, the distance to the specified endpoint for the worst-case accidental release scenario for the following process is less than the distance to the nearest public receptor. The Seminole Gas Processing Plant identified potential candidates for worst-case scenarios and utilized the services of the Wilfred Baker Engineering Company of San Antonio, Texas to perform consequence analyses using the commercially available DNV Technica PHAST dispersion program and the Baker-Strehlow methodology for RMP radius of exposure for a 1-psi overpressure. According to the analyses, the maximum end point for a 1-psi vapor cloud explosion (VCE) is 724 feet (0.14 miles) from the center of the explosion, resulting from the instantaneous release of the inventory contained in the Propylene Accumulator  
storage tank when filled to the greatest amount allowed (80% at 60F). The maximum distance beyond the plant property boundary is 135 feet, which enters into the Amerada Hess Seminole District pipeyard. Since the plant is located in a sparsely populated area, this worst-case release would not affect any public or environmental receptor beyond property owned and occupied by Amerada Hess. 
 
Within the past five years, the process has had no accidental release that caused offsite impacts provided in the Risk Managment Program rule (40 CFR 86.10(b)(1)). No additional measures beyond those stated in the Planned Changes to Improve Safety section of the executive summary are necessary to prevent offsite impacts from accidental releases. In the event of fire, explosion, or a release of a regulated substance from the process, entry within the distance to the specified endpoints may pose a danger to public emergency responders. Therefore, public emergency responders should not enter this area exce 
pt as arranged with the emergency contact indicated in the RMP. The undersigned certifies that, to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, formed after reasonable inquiry, the information submitted is true, accurate and complete. 
 
                                                                                          DONALD A. JENKINS 
________________________________                           ________________________________ 
Signature                                                                             Print Name 
 
PLANT MANAGER                                                              June 15, 1999 
_______________________________________            _____________________ Title                                                                                      Date 
 
 
ACCIDENTAL RELEASE PREVENTION AND RESPONSE POLICIES 
 
The Seminole Gas Processing plant has a long-standing commitment to worker and public safety.  This commitment is demonstrated by the investment o 
f significant resources in accident prevention, such as personnel training,mechanical inspection, process control systems and by recognition of safety as a primary factor in the design, installation, operation and maintenance of our processes. However, if an accidental release does occur, trained plant personnel will respond to control and contain the release. 
 
To prevent accidental releases, the Seminole Gas Processing plant achieves control of hazardous materials by: 
7 A commitment to OSHA's PSM and HAZWOPER standards, EPA's RMP, DOT's Pipeline Safety and Texas Railroad Commission Rule 36 regulations which promote and require adherence to process safety activities designed to prevent accidental releases. 
7 Development and use of Amerada Hess Corporation and Seminole Gas Processing Plant safety, operating, maintenance, emergency response, engineering design and construction policies, procedures and practices designed to prevent accidents and potential releases. 
7 Knowledge of and adhe 
rence to applicable industry recognized standards, specifications and recommended practices that address and provide guidance for the proper design, construction and operation of facilities containing hazardous materials. 
7 A comprehensive equipment inspection and testing program. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
DESCRIPTION OF THE STATIONARY SOURCE AND REGULATED SUBSTANCES 
 
The Seminole Gas Processing Plant, located 3.5 miles North on state highway 214, Seminole, Gaines County, Texas operates a variety of processes, some of which produce petroleum products (e.g., natural gas and natural gas liquids) from an inlet gas stream which is principally carbon dioxide. The plant processes or stores regulated flammables, such as Methane, Natural Gas Liquids and Propylene.  In addition, the plant produces and contains as by-products of processing, Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) and Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) at levels below the listed RMP threshold quantities. 
 
GENERAL ACCIDENTAL RELEASE PREVENTION PROGRAM 
 
Processes at the plant that  
are regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Risk Management Program (RMP) regulation are also subject to the Occupational Safety & Health Administration's (OSHA's) Process Safety Management (PSM) standard. The Seminole Gas Processing Plant adheres to all applicable federal and state regulatory statutes.  
 
 
 
FIVE YEAR ACCIDENT HISTORY 
 
Within the past five years, the Seminole Gas Processing Plant has had no accidental release that caused off site impacts as defined by the Risk Management Program rule (40 CFR 68.10(b)(1).  Within the past 5 years the plant has not experienced an incident involving regulated flammables that caused deaths, injuries, property or environmental damage, evacuations or sheltering in place. 
 
 
EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM INFORMATION 
 
The Seminole Gas Processing Plant maintains a written emergency response program, which is designed to protect worker and public safety as well as the environment.  The program consists of procedures for responding  
to a release of a regulated substance, including the possibility of a fire or explosion if a flammable substance is involved.  The procedure addresses emergency response, proper first aid and medical treatment, evacuation plans, accounting for personnel, notification of local emergency response agencies and the public. In addition, the plant has procedures that address maintenance, inspection and testing and instructions in the use of emergency response equipment. Employees receive training in these procedures as necessary to perform their specific emergency response duties.  The emergency response program is updated when necessary based on modifications made to gas plant processes or other plant facilities.   
 
 
WORST CASE RELEASE SCENARIO 
 
The Seminole Gas Processing Plant identified potential candidates for worst case scenarios and utilized the services of the Wilfred Baker Engineering Company of San Antonio, Texas to perform consequence analyses using the DNV Technica PHAST dispersi 
on program and the Baker-Strehlow methodology for RMP radius of exposure for a 1 psi overpressure.  According to the analyses, the greatest maximum end point for a 1-psi vapor cloud explosion (VCE) is 724 feet (0.14 miles) from the center of the explosion, resulting from the instantaneous release of the inventory contained in the Propylene Accumulator storage tank when filled to the greatest amount allowed (80% at 60F). The maximum distance beyond the plant property boundary is 135 feet, which enters into the Amerada Hess Seminole District pipeyard. Since the plant is located in a sparsely populated area, this worst-case release would not affect any public or environmental receptor beyond property owned and occupied by Amerada Hess.  
 
 
PLANNED CHANGES TO IMPROVE SAFETY 
 
The Seminole Gas Processing Plant conducts ongoing efforts to reduce risk through the Risk Management Program and Process Safety Management. These include recommendations from process hazards analyses, employee suggesti 
ons, and recommendations from incident investigations, recommendations from compliance audits and review of the preventative maintenance and mechanical integrity program information.
Click to return to beginning